Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Do you want my answer, or do you already know and are just asking John for his reason?
  2. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    I don't see much difference...
  3. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    That's what I like about you. You are humble and want truth more than being right. You're a real man. You also are not intimidated by searching the truth in contradictions, even if it means you have to dump denominationalism. I remember when I was 23 (I'm 72) and got the shock of my life. I...
  4. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Right. What needs to be born again is not only the awakening of our dead spirit, but changing our old carnal nature of flesh to the divine nature of the Spirit.
  5. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    All Calvin would have had to do was read 2 Peter 1:9. It is only our past sins that were cleansed, not also our present and future sins. That knowledge would have brought him to the truth by him having to ask, so how do we not willfully sin in the present and future? The answer, a new nature -...
  6. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    Okay, definitely Calvinist, not Arminian nor scripture.
  7. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    The seven letters from Jesus were three-fold letters, so yes one of the directions was universal, one to the current towns of that time, but the third is the different ages of church history.
  8. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution Theory and the presupposed (eisegesis) definition of מוּסָר in Isaiah 53:5

    Yes, I have to agree about dying spiritually. God's killing the clean animal for their clothing instituted for them a sacrifice (for their sins they would continue to commit with their damaged nature, though these sacrifices were to them thank you offerings until the Law, because even though God...
  9. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    @Marymog This is the church age of Pergamos, the church age when the books were being canonized. The Compromising Church 12 “And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write, ‘These things says He who has the sharp two-edged sword: 13 “I know your works, and where you dwell, where Satan’s...
  10. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    They wouldn't care about my experience, any more than I care about theirs. We all have to work out our own salvation and walk with the Lord.
  11. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    I KNOW the voice of the Spirit, but you don't have to believe me, just believe Him. Knowing His voice is WHY 100% of my prayers are answered. Were theirs? I doubt it. Your accusations tell me you are demonstrating the spirit of the accuser of the brethren. Why allow it in?
  12. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    Go to the Author and ask.
  13. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    I couldn't care less what "scholars" believe. They are only opinions and assumptions. I'll keep listening to the Holy Spirit. You do what you like.
  14. CharismaticLady

    Should the books of the bible been more like 77?

    My "proof" is in understanding Revelation 2 and 3.
  15. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution is NOT a “Theory”

    @Enoch111 Penal Substitution is not the P in TULIP so why does anyone think this started in the Reformation? It is clearly Scripture. Arminians and Calvinists alike believe this.
  16. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution Theory and the presupposed (eisegesis) definition of מוּסָר in Isaiah 53:5

    "Differ" with David or with me? I too believe you must endure to the end, but it comes from the power of the Holy Spirit, otherwise the Law could have saved us. But the Law was weak through the flesh, Romans 8:1-9 and only produced the struggle of Romans 7, not yet having the Spirit in Romans 8...
  17. CharismaticLady

    Penal Substitution Theory and the presupposed (eisegesis) definition of מוּסָר in Isaiah 53:5

    I believe we will either be one of four things when we die. Two categories go to hell; two go to heaven. The two that go to heaven are the righteous, and the holy. There will be no sinners. Revelation 22:11 Good night. Great conversing with you.