Search results

You are such a tough guy. Apparently, you think anyone who disagrees with you is either a girl or gay. As if understanding the truth in scripture is based on physical toughness and being as manly as possible. LOL! Keep the laughs coming.

No, his crusade and my crusade and those who believe like we do are against the pretrib doctrine. It's nothing personal against pretribbers themselves. Big difference. We believe strongly in God's word and in the truth and we defend it against false teaching. Is that wrong? Is that not also what...

What good would fleeing do in this day and age of advanced travel and technology where people can be tracked down no matter where they go and can be found no matter where they go? Please explain that to me. Matthew 24:15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by...

There is nothing which says this. Your doctrine is entirely based on speculation rather than clear scripture. What was Daniel praying for? Understanding of the vision he had in Daniel 8:1-14? No. There was no reason for him to do that since an explanation for the vision had already been given...

I agree. There is such a thing. They are both wrong (preterists and hyper-futurists like Douggg). Revelation 11:1 And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. 2 But the court which...

I do admit to hesitating a little bit to call it out like that, knowing you used to believe in it. But, it's too late now. I've done it. :D

Have you done that? Or are you asking us to do something that even you haven't done, which would be quite ridiculous. Why don't you share your interpretation of the parable and then I will share mine. Or I will go first if you prefer. Doesn't matter to me. Let me know. That is a lie. Both WPM...

LOL. I literally laughed out loud at you calling what I said "downplaying it". That was a good one.

Says the guy who asks ridiculous questions like "Do you believe in prophecy?" and "Do you believe in the God who knows the end from the beginning"? Come on. Imagine us asking you questions like that. What person here would say no to those questions? No one. Absolutely ridiculous questions to ask...

That is absolutely true. Pretrib doctrine is a random mishmash of unrelated scriptures. It is truly a giant, convoluted, indiscernible, incomprehensible mess. I can barely take it seriously.

You missed the point as you always do. How many people do you know who agree with your overall doctrine? I would think none. I've never seen anyone else who believes what you do. But, many people believe the same as I do. My point is that God does not reveal truth to just one person. If you...

That verse does not have the same context as John 5:28-29 which only referred to a future event and not something that "now is" (was already happening at the time Jesus was speaking). That verse should be understood in the same sense as what Paul wrote about here: Ephesians 2:1 As for you, you...

Are you actually reading what I'm saying? I don't get that impression. I'm not saying that the church in Sardis wouldn't be affected by that hour of trial. Of course they would be since it would affect the entire world. Which proves what exactly? It doesn't prove that Him conditionally coming as...

This is false. In Daniel 9:23 Gabriel was not referring to any previous vision that Daniel had. Daniel 9:23 At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision. The...

I only hear crickets responding to my post #49. @Davidpt do you have any thoughts about what I said in that post? I'd particularly like to know your thoughts about what I said about applying the same logic you use to determine the antecedent for the "he" in Daniel 9:27 to the antecedent for...

Hilarious. There you have it. Grammar means nothing to Douggg. No wonder he has so many strange beliefs. Sorry, Douggg, but grammar does matter. Without any regard for grammar, we can make scripture say whatever we want it to say. Is that why you don't care about grammar, Douggg?

While he does interpret the prince as being the Messiah, he is not saying "the prince" in verse 26 is the antecedent to the "he" in verse 27, but rather that the specific mention of the Messiah is the antecedent to the "he" in verse 27. I know this because I've read everything he has said about...

Globally, obviously. Why do you ask? Because I said "the message for the church in Philadelphia was specifically for the people in the church in Philadelphia"? What I meant by that was not that the hour of trial coming upon the whole world would only come upon Philadelphia. Hello! Obviously, I...

I am not doing that. My method of interpreting scripture is to use scripture to interpret scripture when possible and to relate two (or more) scriptures together if they have the same context. If you think a warning by Jesus given specifically to a first century church in Sardis has the same...

Oh, yes you do and you have made false accusations towards me. Now, you're lying. I'm not waiting for that if you're talking about an individual Man of Sin as I assume you are. I very specifically told you this. I explained my understanding of the man of sin and you apparently ignored it or...