Search results

Mormons are not Spirit-filled. There is a difference and you have to KNOW God's voice to relate to what I'm saying. That doesn't mean you have to believe me yourself.

I go by the content, and have decided for myself. I am also Spirit-filled and feel confident it was inspired and written by an apostle. Man's carnal tradition is that it was not. Who do you trust more? The Spirit or carnal man?

I do not like Origin's doctrines, and Clement wrote about the phoenix in one of his letters. I don't consider either one filled with the Spirit.

Rome was destroying everything Christian until Constantine, so I see reason for it or copies of it winding up in Alexandria, Greece. Rome is why we have no original parchments. As for the date, I've seen "scholars" say around 130 AD. Others say first century and that it was read in all the early...

Nor does Hebrews. I think they were both written by the same person, who was close to Paul. That is also what the early church must have thought too to not question the name, The Epistle of Barnabas.

Call me crazy but I don't trust man's theories. That is also why I am not a denominationalist, but that's another topic. LOL

You do know that was an opinion that it was written by Alexandrian Greeks. I don't agree. As far as the timing it was written after 70 A.D. It is only tradition that Barnabas was killed before that. Jesus told of the destruction of the temple not only as a prophecy but as a warning. Christians...

As the saying goes, "Don't should on me." Did you write this? Or who wrote it? I see errors in their or your deductions. BTW, are you a Seventh-day Adventist? I can only see them or Messianics not wanting Christ to have fulfilled the Sabbath.

I only think one is missing making the number divisible by 7. 28 And that is why I believe that the Epistle of Barnabas is the missing book for our time. Did you write this, or did you find this somewhere. I have read it many times and do find it doctrinally sound. Barnabas was an apostle.

They were supplied with many lists of candidate suggestions from different sources in the Church at large. The Epistle of Barnabas was on 6 of those lists, yet they failed to accept it. I think I know why. It had a prophecy in it, but the timing of the fulfillment would not have been for over a...

As I said, the 27 books of the New Testament are canonical, but do we have all the books that are God-breathed in our New Testament; or are one or more missing based on the decisions of man? The biggest pagan adaptation is the worship of Ashtoreth and Tammuz.

We are not rejecting the New Testament, just questioning if we have it all. I believe the Epistle of Barnabas is missing, but God has preserved it.

That isn't true. There was the Roman Church, and the original church lead by the desposyni - relatives of Jesus.

Do you know his work? He proved that not just the thought was inspired, but ever letter.

Every "scripture" is God-breathed. Paul was Spirit-filled and when he wrote, he knew what was inspired, and what was his own advice but not inspired, and told us what was a commandment of God.

Alice in Wonderland was written by a pedophile. I think we can safely say it should not be added. LOL I love @rockytopva 's open mind. He is a seeker. I don't like the RCC telling me what is canonical in the New Testament, especially during the age of Pergamos when they added many pagan rituals...

Dr. Ivan Panin

The Old and New EACH have to be divisible by 7, so 70 wouldn't work.

I keep myself under scrutiny. Do you?

Good to know about Esther. I've always heard it wasn't. I wonder why they said that. Was there a previous Jewish compilation of books prior to the Tanakh?