Search results

Nope. I see you copying and pasting copious amounts of information to a simple question. Seems you are baffling yourself with BS.

LOL. Beings are not words. Logic Definition Language usage.

Weak. If Jesus said to baptize in the name of Moe, Larry and Curly, it does not mean they are God. And it say nothing of their co-equal, co-eternal, co-substantial nature.

No assumption. It’s simply a fact that the trinity is not in the Bible. By contrast, God is said to be one alone over and over again. Even Jesus tells his Father he is the one true God at John 17:3. Doesn’t this mean anything to you?

Today’s devotional reading brought me to verses that destroy OSAS. 1 Samuel 10 explains how the Spirit of the LORD not only came to be with Saul, it possessed Saul. I believe this is the only instance of Divine Possession in Scripture. Yet, Saul turned from God and lost the blessings of God.

Circular Reasoning. People turn to God and then are sealed with the Holy Spirit. Given your theology is the other way around, that people have God in them & selected them from the start, what purpose does the Great Commission serve?

The 49 commands of Christ

Disgusting! I do have a problem with anyone who thinks their doctrine saves people! It is not doctrine but a man chosen by God who saves people He will decide who is to be in the Book of Life and who isn’t. It is not the inanimate object of his blood but his sacrificial death in obedience to...

Pure manmade invention contrary to Matthew 7:21. I sense a duality regarding WITH compared to IN.

Disgusting how you equate the prophecy and authority of God’s Son with a group of mortals (called the corrupt Roman Catholic Church)

I was tracking with you until this. Please clarify.

The RCC is corrupt and has been for a Millenia.

It accurately describes the implications of the doctrine, not withstanding your high opinion of the practitioners.

That is not the true church. The idea that an all-powerful deity would found a church on the power of a breath, a puny man is absurd.

So many contradictions ... if there is no license to sin, which I agree with, then, there must be consequences and death is the ultimate consequence.

The exact opposite is what Jesus said in Matthew 7:21.

Then OSAS is a license to sin - and universalism is correct doctrine.

As Ferris pointed out earlier, this is milk, not solid food.

If It does not totally deny why Jesus told people to Sin No More; then why did Jesus day this?

It does not matter who judges. If there is only lip service faith it is dead.