Search results

I’m not sure what could be more relevant than the word of God contains no explicit teaching of the trinity. It’s absence is so profound, trinitarians cannot accept this basic fact of Scripture.

Worse, they do no see holding onto the life raft as necessary action once Jesus throws the life raft to us, drowning in our own sins. Worst of all, they deny Jesus waits to throw the life raft to us pending our action to put faith in his saving us.

This point has been made to OSAS dozens of times.

Something granted in the past due to something done in the future. Some kind of time travel there.

Just a human invention untied to Scripture.

There it is again; that odd ex post facto invocation of not knowing a true Christian until ... wait for it .... action is observed.

Obviously, we disagree with that. Other verses clearly state Jesus said to baptize in his name. Trinitarian dualists do not recognize this contradicts the verse that references 3 on the contradictory idea that they are one. Why do all the prologues of all the epistles reference only the...

I don’t think you know that ONE cannot reference “they.” More violations of Logic Definition Language Usage.

Appeal to Ignorance. Implied premise is that it only makes sense to Baptize in the name of a God. Many US holidays are named after men who are not Holy.

Exactly! Trinitarians abuse of logic extends to NOT EQUAL to mean its antonym.

I have. Tonight I can share the link with you. I put it in a thread about why the Apostles were disobedient.

While there are nuance differences with monotheism, they are theologies that reject dualism stand in opposition to trinitarianism. I am a unitarian Christian. This means I hold there are 2 beings, not 3, involved in our salvation: God, who alone is the Father and his adopted son Jesus. God is...

Sounds like effort to me. work out your salvation with fear and trembling Philippians 2:12

WRONG! That is where you are dead wrong! Faith is action, work, just not ‘works’ as the Bible means it. As someone else pointed out, Grace is not opposed to effort, only the earned. You have no response but to repeat yourself.

That’s where we disagree. If what you are saying is true, then universalism is correct doctrine. Or do you concede some work on our part is necessary to be saved initially? If not, what is the purpose of the Great Commission? What is your sick obsession with blood?

You lack discernment. Works in the Bible and action (work) are not synonyms. Romans 5:2 explains the process begins with our work, our faith establishes grace.

Repeating ourselves is pointless. There is many proofs Jesus is not God. Jesus died and was resurrected by God is an obvious one. Does it not mean anything to you that Jesus said his Father is the one true God at John 17:3? Does it not mean anything to you that Jesus talked about his God at...

Nope. You are stuck in infancy, only taking in milk when you should be on solid food by now.

Irrelevant. Are you subscribing to abrogation? He gave us 49 commands. Not sure how you justify ignoring the commands of the Lord?

No. I already defined it Faith = Belief + Action Romans 5:2 explains that faith establishes grace. I think this is very much relevant. Belief is valueless apart from action. Belief is lip service.