Search results

LOL!!! This causes you to come to conclusions like thinking people stopped eating and drinking for 6 days before the flood came. As if seeing Noah go onto the ark (as if that alone) would make them stop eating and drinking. LOL! You say you "go by the text", but don't care if you defy all logic...

LOL!!!!!!!! You also want to manipulate the text to make it say what you want it to say. If you want to claim that they were eating and drinking and marrying only until Noah entered the ark and claim that this happened 6 days before the flood came, then you have no choice but to conclude that...

This does not say that the flood didn't start until 7 days after Noah went into the ark. It may very well have started raining immediately after he went into the ark, but the water didn't actually cover the earth until after the first 7 days went by. How else can we make sense of what Jesus said...

LOL! This is too much nonsense to take seriously. Not worth the time. Please ask God for wisdom (James 1:5-7).

No, I reject your interpretations of scripture. I would never reject scripture itself. Why do you not make the same comparison to the days of Lot? Why do you not compare the rapture to Lot leaving Sodom, which occurred on the same day that Sodom was destroyed? How convenient.

Then why did you say "Israel is the HEART of the Christian Bible" and quote a verse referring to "the Lord God of Israel"? Jesus is the heart of the Christian Bible and God is not just the God of the Jews, but also of the Gentiles. You didn't come across as being aware of this.

Do you have any books besides Luke in the New Testament part of your Bible? Romans 3:29 Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also: Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. You act as...

I think it's easier to pull teeth than to get them to actually quote scripture and break down how exactly they understand it. The reason they don't do this is obvious. It's because they know they can't do it convincingly. They know that they have no clear scripture that they can present which...

Good question. I certainly disagree that Paul quoted from the book of Revelation. Not possible.

Let me be very clear. You are not the one to solve any mystery for me. I disagree with you on almost everything and that is not likely to ever change. This type of logic just boggles my mind. It's utter nonsense. No, throughout the book of Revelation the beast is the beast (whatever you believe...

Obviously. But, somehow not much in Revelation 19? :IDK: Sure. Again, you are not acknowledging where it says "the beast was" even before John wrote the book of Revelation. So, if "the beast that was" is a man, he would be at least around 2,000 years old by now. I've pointed this out to you...

I used to say "NOT!" all the time when I was an immature kid. I guess you just haven't grown up yet. You show your lack of discernment by not understanding that Proverbs 14:12 is not talking physical death. Everyone dies physically whether they live the right way (God's way) or not. But, this...

If that's how you see it, so be it, but it's not as if you can then try to tell someone else that they should look at the text more literally. Some people take too much of it literally. Everyone needs to find a way to determine what type of text is being used in any given verse or passage. I...

You want me to continue doing all your work for you. I'm the only one actually quoting scripture and explaining exactly how I interpret it. You are not doing that at all. I'm done with you.

One of us actually took scripture and explained exactly how they understood it. And one of us just makes immature comments while doing absolutely nothing to show how they interpret any given verse or passage. Can you figure out which one is which? I'm sure everyone else can. It's clearly a waste...

Wrong about what? What are you trying to say here? Can you please address what I actually said? Do you have anything to offer besides vague comments? Start being more specific and showing exactly what you're talking about or else I will just have to ignore you.

You misrepresent my view more often than you present it accurately. You have a very serious reading comprehension problem. I do NOT say that the elders can't represent the church. I'm simply saying that them having gold crowns on their heads does not mean that they have already received the...

Exactly! Well said. As for your last comment, he (The Light) needs to address that. He takes pride in how literal he takes scripture, but somehow Noah going on to the ark 7 days before the flood equates to the rapture occurring 7 YEARS before the second coming of Christ. Pure nonsense.

Great response. Thank you for admitting that you have no answer for what I said. You hide that by just calling it "word salad", which it is not. You just don't want to make any effort to dig deeper to find the truth.

The "already gathered to heaven saints" will be the souls of the dead in Christ that will be with Him when He comes. It does not say that they have been changed and have immortal bodies yet at that point. 1 Thessalonians 4:14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also...