Search results

Say what now? That's correct. I'm glad you're at least understanding what I'm saying, whether you agree or not. That's progress. I'm devastated that you disagree with me about that. I hope I can recover. Verse 29 is not talking about the tribulation described in Matthew 24:15-21. It it...

Yeah, so? The prince was to come some time after the prophecy was written. You have the people of the supposed anti-messiah prince destroying the city and the sanctuary long before the supposed anti-messiah prince even exists, which makes no sense. You're acting as if the prophecy says "the...

And as explained in many other posts that I've made. It's no secret that I believe that. The tribulation before Christ returns is global. Matthew 24:15-22 does not describe a global tribulation. Jesus said let those in Judea flee to the mountains when that tribulation was about to happen. He...

Those who you falsely accuse of believing in replacement theology agree that nothing is replaced. Next, indeed.

There's no gap in the 70th week. I'm not going to speak for him, but in my view the new covenant is eternal and it took one week/7 years (the 70th week) to confirm it. Once it was confirmed then the 70th week was over. No gap. The confirming of the covenant consisted of Christ's ministry, His...

You are making a mess of the prophecy. The prince that shall come was to come as of the time the prophecy was written, not still to come even today. You can't say the people of the prince destroyed the city and the sanctuary in 70 AD and then also try to say that the prince of those people...

What people who you accuse of adhering to "replacement theology" actually believe is not that anyone gets replaced, but rather that Gentile believers join together with Israelite believers together as one body of God's people. Otherwise known as the body of Christ, the church or spiritual...

Wow, I wasn't expecting this answer. So, who was the anti-messiah prince who was around in 70 AD whose people destroyed the city and the sanctuary in 70 AD?

I'm not going to admit something that isn't true. God forbid. As written, it doesn't say that the covenant itself lasts for 7 years, it says it takes 7 years to confirm the covenant. Why do I need to admit anything for you to acknowledge what Jesus accomplished with His death and resurrection...

And what sanctuary would the people of this supposed anti-messiah destroy?

You denied that Jesus confirmed any covenant with anyone. You were proven wrong. Humble yourself and admit that. Can you acknowledge that Jesus confirmed the new covenant with many by way of forgiving the sins of many through His blood (all those who belong to Him)?

He said more than once that the new covenant is eternal, so why would you ask this? Do you know what the new covenant is?

I agree, but, as I just pointed out in my previous post, there's also the fact that Daniel 12:2 indicates that both believers and unbelievers will be resurrected "at that time" of the great tribulation described in Daniel 12:1. Well, pre-tribs don't believe that both believers and unbelievers...

Yes, I agree. I can't recall where I originally found it. Maybe on your website? :)

But, when you also read Daniel 12:2 it doesn't just mention the resurrection of believers at that time, but of unbelievers as well. Daniel 12:2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt. Pre-tribs do not...

He explained this in post #20 and I expanded on what he said in post #21. Here is what I said in post #21: "Doug believes the OT saints, which includes Daniel, are included among the dead in Christ and will all be resurrected when Jesus comes (supposedly) before the great tribulation. Yet...

Revelation 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. You referenced Isaiah 29 without specifying why, but I think in this case it makes...

Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their...

LOL. This is hilarious coming from you. No one on this entire site puts out more incoherent gibberish than you, and yet you are asking how anyone can take him seriously? Yes, it most certainly does. Since when is something ever referred to as the first without there also being a second? That's...

I never said you were wrong about it, so you're getting all bent out of shape about nothing. I said all along that I believe Daniel 9:27 is about Jesus. How can you have missed that? No, I am not. You are acting as if I denied that I believe Daniel 9:27 is about Jesus and I never did any such...