Search results

I don't know how, but you are completely misunderstanding his view. He doesn't even believe Daniel 9:27 is about Jesus, but thinks it's about an Antichrist confirming a 7 year covenant (peace treaty?) in the future instead.

How can it fit your view if we're talking in terms of everlasting righteousness being brought in literally when Christ returns? How does that fit with your belief that the following would occur after His return? Revelation 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out...

Because there is no indication that it was listing those things in the order they would be accomplished. Why would you assume that would be the case? There's something not right about you making assumptions about what the text is saying. Where does it indicate that it was listing those things...

John 5:28 “Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29 and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned. Jesus said an hour or time is coming when ALL who...

So, it looks like it is your belief that the 70th week won't end until the new heavens and new earth are ushered in. In the literal sense that you are talking about, everlasting righteousness would not be brought in until a thousand years (plus Satan's little season) after the return of Christ...

How can you not recognize that making reconciliation for iniquity is related closely to finishing the transgression and making an end of sins? Why would you think that Jesus would only fulfill one of the six things listed? You are far too literal for your own good. It causes you to have many...

Can you tell me how you reconcile your belief in three separate mass resurrections with what Jesus taught here: John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the...

As usual, you are very difficult to follow. So, just tell me this. Do you believe Revelation 16:12-16 and Revelation 19:19 are referring to the same battle? If so, why are you trying to criticize me about chronology when you are doing the same thing I am with those verses? I just happen to...

Did you have trouble understanding my question? Are you unable to answer it? Let me try again. How will reconciliation be made for iniquity? Once you answer that question, I will address what you said in your post. I didn't want to overwhelm you by talking about all six things at once. I...

How do you interpret this verse: Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy...

Yes, I confirmed what I had already said several times. Congrats on reading what I said this time. Not about this. You either have horrible reading comprehension skills or a terrible memory. Which is it? First of all, what you need to recognize is that the "he" of verse 27 is referring back to...

I'll just address what you said up to here since what you said after this didn't make any sense to me (your chart doesn't, either, so please don't refer to that). So, please clarify something for me. When do you believe Daniel 12:2 will occur in relation to the return of Jesus Christ? You said...

I disagree about when the time period being represented in that passage began, though I do agree it's talking about something that would happen for an extended period of time until the day Jesus returns. Matthew 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved...

Apparently. Definitely in his case. He can't grasp the concept of people like us, WPM and jeffweeder being neither preterists nor futurists. He thinks everyone has to be one or the other.

How can I run from questions that you hadn't previously asked me? LOL. You continue to make yourself look silly with every post you make. It's almost impossible to take you seriously. And how does this even address what I said in my post which had to do with Daniel 9:24? Do you agree with...

Revelation 17:8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was...

You have nothing, so you resort to your weak gnat/camel argument. Just admit that your capitalization argument is weak and stop being so prideful.

Now you're falsely accusing him of applying that passage to 70 AD as well? You've made that false claim against at least three of us now. Do you ever stop?

I, of course, fully agree. But, I thought I'd make it simple by just mentioning the one that I thought he'd have the most trouble trying to come up with a way that it could be fulfilled apart from Jesus. Of course, we know that none of those things could be fulfilled apart from Jesus. The 70...

As I prophesied, he's trying to get around it.