Search results

Except for universalism not being correct doctrine. If internal ‘works’ were not required, there would be no need to advocate to keep the faith.

Scripture explicitly says God is NOT under Jesus’ feet. Not the ‘Father’ but God in his unitarian nature. This is the opposite of equality. 1 Corinthians 15:27 The Voice 27 All this will happen to fulfill the Scripture that says, “You placed everything on earth beneath His feet.” (Although it...

Reply to my first post on the many inequalities between Jesus and God.

Again. Just ignore my first post of the many inequalities. Hebrews 1:8 quotes David who was talking about God.

I know that my first post in this thread detailing many inequalities has been ignored. John 3:16. God sent his son. The Son did not send God. See the inequality?

I’ve already totally refuted the claim. I’m not going to do it in multiple languages. BTW, a rationalization is hardly a fact. The fact is the trinity is not in the Bible, which is monotheist text.

No. I speak English. I am Groot. See my signature.

An intelligent mind can rationalize anything. Father and son denote inequality, by definition.

John 1:18 is the summary statement for the Gospel of John. No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father’s heart, who has made him known.

Wrong. John 1:1 refers to God. Trinitarians want to suppose it refers to Jesus.

“Equality” as seen in Western societies comes from Satan, is anti-Christian and anti-American. The term comes from godless cultural Marxists who hope to confuse freedom loving Americans with the founding principle of equal rights and equal protection under the law. The ultimate goal is to...

Refer to your favorite lexicon. Only trinitarians deny begotten could possibly mean procreation, which is obviously a form of creation.

It’s not a question of possible but what is absent from the Bible. The trinity is not in the Bible. The entire Bible is written by monotheist Jews who reject the trinity to this day. Therefore, projecting trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text is futile. The idea that this common expression...

Sad reliance on a trinitarian corrupted translation. From a literal translation of the verse. Romans 1:20 New Revised Standard Version 20 Ever since the creation of the world his eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have been understood and seen through the things he has...

Another poster pointed out the passage that Adam was the man who brought sin into the world and that was balanced by a perfect man who redeemed the world. Of course, this poses no problem for dualists.

Great point.

Great point.

The “or” part is a total invention. Like the trinity, “Godhead” is not to be found in the monotheist text of the Bible.

I agree with you here.