Search results

Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Not in my experience. In my experience Hebrews 4:12 is true. (NLT) For the word of God is alive and powerful. It is sharper than the sharpest two-edged sword, cutting between soul and spirit, between joint and marrow. It exposes our innermost thoughts and desires. I talked with a pastor who had...

Here is a crap ton of errors. But the most famous is I John 5:7-8, where the 3 witnesses are not trinitarian.

Wow! Flagrant KJVism. Criticism of a translation of a book a half a millennia old is no kind of blasphemy against the HS. While it is common knowledge the KJV is the most important book ever written in the English language: It does contain some errors. Is written in near Middle English. As a...

I’ve explained this many times. You didn’t see the vid I posted? The Word is the Word of God. John 1:1 is properly interpreted as fulfilling Deuteronomy 18:15-18. Trinitarians are so desperate to find anything, anything at all in Scripture to support their unworkable doctrine, they pretend...

Reading comprehension. That is one take on it, brother. I meant appear, as in, upon closer inspection, the emperor has not clothes (despite what trinitarians want you to believe).

You were not doing that at all. You were abusing the meaning of words. Look, logic only works when the premises are true. If the premise is not true, then the conclusion, while logical, is not true. You must understand this. P1: Brother means male biological sibling. P2: Jesus had brothers...

Few seem to understand this. I know. Just trying to be concise. The point is Jesus did not correct the scribe in saying God alone is one, which does not bode well for trinitarianism. That would have been an excellent opportunity to introduce 1 = 3 IF Jesus thought it were so.

Yup. This is what 'appear' means in the sentence? It only appears the emperor has new clothes based on what everyone is saying.

You can’t admit that your posts here are theologically driven. Not sure what words in the Bible can be relied upon if brother and sister is too complicated for you to grasp with any confidence. Can you at least admit that Jesus having biological brothers and sisters is a reasonable...

Irrelevant. The text is not figurative. The text repeatedly refers to the literal (biological) brothers and sisters of Jesus. What’s interesting is how Jesus responds to this literal information. He talks about who his figurative mother and brothers are.

Saying it over and over again doesn’t make it any more right. No where in the OT is God incarnate prophesied. No where is the trinity as Biblical authors are all anti-trinitarian. (This fact should make you question the trinitarian projection onto the text)

Very desperate.

KJV <> Word of God KJV translators got some things wrong.

OMG! You are getting increasingly desperate. Click here to understand how Matthew 28:19 is likely a corruption. Beyond that, if you read the text you will discover it does not even speak of the nature of God (let alone, if you do not believe this nature of God, you cannot be saved). If Jesus...

Sir, one way you know you are wrong is the Jewish people do not prophecy 2 comings of the Messiah. On top of that, if you are relying on Zechariah 9:9-10 as prophesying 2 Comings, I do not see it any predication of a 2nd Coming. (I thought you were relying on NT verses). 9 Cry out with joy...

The verses trinitarians distort by supposing it must support trinitarians, such as John 1:1. (But after learning more, one realizes these verses do not support trinitarianism) Right. Saying something 'differently' is not the same as not saying ANYTHING LIKE There is one God, who is trinitarian...

I've thoroughly read the Bible. The trinity is not in the Bible. Supposing the Gospel = trinitarian doctrine is ridiculous. You seem to ignore the fact that trinitarian doctrine came about 4 centuries after Jesus walked the Earth.

If the trinity were in the Bible, you would have been able to present the verse that states the trinitarian doctrine. In lieu of that, you present species verses that only by imposing trinitarian doctrine onto it does it seem to support your position but falls under the slightest scrutiny. For...

Did you not read the link that debunked the trinitarian claim that Isaiah 9:6 is a prophecy of Jesus? The other point that I've made repeatedly is how the man-is-God thesis is so strong, you do not even realize that Isaiah 9:6 does not even mention the HS and therefore, cannot be used to...