Search results

Apparently, he wrote the book of Hebrews if our friend BreadOfLife is correct. He's full of secret information.

Are you being purposely dense? You referenced eternal security as if that was a universal Protestant doctrine. Maybe you should think about how you word things for the first time in your life, Junior.

You have NOTHING to teach me, Einstein Junior. Don't waste your time. You accusing others of Sophomoric insults when that is ALL you have to offer. That is rich. Keep the laughs coming, kid.

The Catholic Church is certainly part of the great city Mystery Babylon, at least, even if not Mystery Babylon itself. Revelation 18:15 The merchants who sold these things and gained their wealth from her will stand far off, terrified at her torment. They will weep and mourn 16 and cry out...

Here you go again acting as if all Protestants are Calvinists. You are incredibly ignorant.

I'm sorry. I had the impression that you had some semblance of intelligence. My bad. I see that I was wrong. Wrong, Einstein Junior. One passage is about things people say and the other is about things people do. That is not the same context at all. You must not even know what the word context...

But, he was right in accusing you of that. You had no basis for reporting him. You referenced 1 Thess 4:17 which has to do with the resurrected dead in Christ being caught up together with those who are still alive at Christ's return. And 2 Thess 2:1 is clearly about that same event. So, to say...

I agree that it was shameful for him to leave out the actual context of 1 Thessalonians 4:17 which is that the resurrected dead in Christ will be caught up together with those who are still alive at the time Jesus comes to meet Him in the air. And 2 Thess 2:1 is clearly a reference to that same...

Looks like you didn't read what I said since you didn't address what I said at all, so I'll just repeat it. Please read it this time. You're just not getting it. Of course he was not the literal Elijah and no one is saying that. But, we know from passages like Matthew 11:11-14 and Matthew...

You don't understand what it means to have part in the first resurrection, which scripture teaches was Christ's resurrection: Acts 26:23 that the Messiah would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dead, would bring the message of light to his own people and to the Gentiles.” 1 Corinthians...

In my view there is no question whatsoever that He was speaking about the second coming of Christ. Do you think that Paul was not speaking about the second coming of Christ here: 1 Thessalonians 5:1 Now, brothers and sisters, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, 2 for you know...

Agree completely. Yes, Christ's death and resurrection guaranteed that the curse will be removed, but it has not yet actually been removed. Which is clear because people are still sinning and dying. You are absolutely right that he has bought in to some full preterist teachings here.

I agree to an extent, but I don't think it makes sense to think that a prophet would go back and forth between literal and metaphor within the same sentence, such as in Mark 13:24-25.

Not so fast. Revelation 6:12-17 was referenced first and I had my mind on that and then read the Mark 13 passage, but probably not as carefully as I should have. The Revelation 6 passage specifically mentions stars falling to the earth. In a literal sense that would result in the complete...

Well, I need to rethink this. I saw the reference to Revelation 6:12-17 which talks about stars falling to the earth. That can't be literal because that would mean the earth was annihilated even before the wrath of the Lamb came down on the earth, which obviously makes no sense. But, looking at...

I have to point out what Peter said in 2 Peter 3:5-7 again because that establishes the context of what he wrote in 2 Peter 3:10-12. 3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, “Where is this ‘coming’...

I don't understand this. What is described in Revelation 20:9 occurs before what is described in Revelation 20:15. So, why are you (seemingly) equating those two verses? Do you not think that God's enemies will be physically destroyed? He's done it before. Why not again?

Imagine being a giraffe and having a sore throat. That would be terrible. Sorry, I don't know why that was my takeaway from your post. I'm feeling a little silly today, I guess.

So, which cult are you part of which teaches that having the correct eschatological beliefs is a requirement for salvation then? Looks like you forgot to answer the question.

This is absolutely false. What cult are you part of which teaches that one's understanding of eschatology is a determining factor in salvation?