Search results

I doubt it. I certainly hope not. Whenever someone has to resort to extreme nonsense like saying that being "in Jesus" is something different than being "in Christ", you know they are desperately clinging to their precious false doctrine instead of acknowledging that it's false and seeking the...

How much time have you wasted coming up with ludicrous ideas such as thinking that being "in Jesus" is different than being "in Christ"? You wouldn't need to spend any time coming up with ideas like that if you believed the truth in the first place. But, since you believe in false doctrine that...

You should be saying these things to yourself. It is YOU who thinks that scripture is always logical and written in such a way that even an unbeliever can understand it. If an unbeliever used the same hyper-literal approach to interpreting scipture as you do, they would come to the same...

I don't recall any rule that says someone has to ask for an opinion before someone gives an opinion. I certainly never asked for yours, either. But, you gave it, anyway. And that's fine. No, your method is clearly very carnal. You make assumptions about any given verse that it must be taken...

Where does it say anything about Jesus reigning on earth in Revelation 20? Is this all you have? A passage that does not even say anything about Him reigning on earth is the only thing you have to support your view that He will reign on the earth? You have no other NT scripture to back up your view?

I never said that I'm reigning in heaven, you silly goose. Of course I'm on earth. Are you? I didn't say that I reign with Christ in heaven. I'm not in heaven, I'm on earth. I reign with Him here. Why don't you pay attention to what I actually say and believe instead of making things up? I...

There is something very wrong with you. You are basically telling me that my belief that I have spiritually had part in Christ's resurrection is worthless. So, I guess you believe what Paul wrote about in these passages is worthless then? Ephesians 2:4 But because of his great love for us, God...

Yes, I do. I just don't have the same understanding of what that means as you do. It's figurative language describing how He will destroy His enemies. It comes from this passage: Psalm 2:7 I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. 8...

As I said, unbelievers are never referred to as "the righteous" in scripture. That is a fact. Trying to say otherwise makes me wonder about what you actually believe. I'm wondering if maybe you follow some other religion than Christianity if you think someone can be considered righteous in God's...

How does it refute our belief that He is now King over all the earth? That is what scripture teaches. After His resurrection and before His ascension He said this: Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. You don't accept what...

Yes, it's after the thousand years. I agree. But, where did Peter indicate that it would be long after Christ's return? The context of what he wrote in 2 Peter 3 does not fit that theory at all. Peter told his readers that they "ought to live holy and godly lives" while they look forward to the...

LOL. Why should he bother wasting his time to study something that is so obviously complete nonsense that you made up in your imagination? You should be embarrassed for coming up with this ridiculous nonsense that tries to differentiate between being in Jesus and in Christ (Jesus is Christ...

This is pure nonsense. You are just making things up as you go because you realize that you can't support your doctrine without making nonsense up like this.

There is no difference. This is something you are making up. This is what people do (twist scripture) to keep their doctrine afloat rather than just accepting what scripture teaches. What are you talking about here? I'll tell you if I know about this if you explain what you are talking about.

Why are you continuing to not answer my question? Is that because you don't have an answer? Once again, why will we be meeting Jesus "in the air" if we're just going to immediately go back down to the earth afterwards? There would have to be some reason for that. Do you even have a guess? Or do...

This is very ironic. It is because of your CARNAL way of looking at things that you ASSUME that the 1,000 year reign is a literal one thousand years on earth. I don't see anything SPIRITUAL about the way you interpret scripture. You interpret it no differently than you'd interpret a news...

That God keeps His promises to "a thousand generations" is also PLAINLY SAID in scripture. Does that mean His promises expire after a literal thousand generations or is the word "thousand" used figuratively there? That God owns the cattle "on a thousand hills" is also PLAINLY SAID in scripture...

Can you show me anywhere in the New Testament where this supposed 1,000 year kingdom on earth is referenced?

That passage is what I was discussing with David in NJ when you chimed in asking who are the two witnesses. Was that by mistake then? I responded to you about the two witnesses in a different post, but that was not the post that you replied to. I think you must have meant to reply to that other...

Scripture does not differentiate between those two things as if they were two separate events. When He comes, He will come in fire and in glory. Trying to say Him coming in fire and returning in glory are two different events is the kind of thing people come up with when they need to twist...