Search results

There's nothing simple about your convoluted, dispensational doctrine.

This is a blatant lie. No, it does not only present "the army of the beasts and the beasts" being killed/destroyed. Take a closer look. Revelation 19:17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great...

Yes, it is. Your rhetoric does nothing but show your desperation. You are so desperate to cling to your false doctrine that you will stoop as low as possible to try to make yourself look better, including making insults like this. It's not working, buddy. What? That is nonsense. The scripture...

You obviously didn't get my point, so I guess I will have to spell it out to you. Do you stop reading at verse 16? Read the rest of the chapter from there. Zechariah 14:17 If any of the peoples of the earth do not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord Almighty, they will have no...

We were talking about Revelation 20:7-9. Where does it say there that those who number "as the sand of the sea" are "only the armies gathered among the nations for war"? I don't claim to be in heaven. Do you have anything to offer besides straw man arguments? Apparently not. I don't claim to...

This illustrates a major problem with Premil. You deny that Christ reigns now even though scripture clearly teaches that He does. Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Ephesians 1:19 and his incomparably great power for us...

What a bunch of nonsense. You are just a clown. You are unable to refute what we actually believe, so you make things up instead and refute your straw man, which is a complete waste of time.

No, that is not what I believe. I believe that Jesus Himself will destroy all of His enemies with fire when He returns (2 Peter 3:10-13). You think what is described in the following passage is meaningless? Because my understanding is based on passages like this: Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus...

Exactly. In terms of the book of Revelation, all we need to do is look at other references to the holy city to see how to properly identify it in Revelation 11. Revelation 21:2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed...

Oh, you don't like false claims being made about what you believe? That's interesting.

You continually accuse me of being a preterist, but I do NOT believe that all or a majority of the Olivet Discourse had come to pass by AD 70. I only believe that a minority of it came to pass by then. So, by this definition you gave here, I am NOT a preterist. Yet, I feel certain that you will...

Right. I tried to give him another chance, but I see he has not changed at all. I don't need that. I would rather talk to people who are able to respectfully disagree on things.

We do NOT believe all of Matthew 24 is fulfilled like preterists do. Your pathetic attempts to try to lump us in with those who believe all of Matthew 24 and all of Revelation up to at least Revelation 19 are fulfilled only serves to make you look like a fool who can't tell the difference...

No, we are not. You obviously are very stubborn and will just continue to insist on misrepresenting what we believe, so I'm done with you. I don't have any desire to waste my time on children like you.

So, you believe that animal sacrifices will be reinstated when Christ returns? Celebrating the feast of tabernacles involves performing animal sacrifices. If you take that literally and believe it will occur when Christ returns then you are forced to believe in the reinstatement of animal...

The same can be said about you, though. There have been several times when you have ignored questions and, instead of directly answering them, you just repeat things that you had already said many times.

I agree. But, this does not change the FACT that Jesus Christ's resurrection was the first resurrection unto bodily immortality. So, the mass resurrection of the dead in Christ at His return is not the first resurrection. His resurrection was the first. You're not making any sense. If that is...

How does your understanding line up with what Peter said here: 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. 11 Since everything will be...

It wasn't really my intention to have an ongoing discussion about Matthew 22:14. I referenced that in my attempt to show that the word translated as "many" or "multitudes" doesn't have to mean "not all", which is a fact. But, since I strongly disagree with what you're saying here, I can't help...

I do not call being born again a resurrection. Let me tell you what I believe instead of you trying to tell me what I believe. That only makes you look like a fool when you constantly misrepresent what I believe. I do not claim that the resurrection of the dead referenced in passages like John...