Search results

In Matthew 25:31-46, it indicates that "the sheep", which represent "the righteous" (verse 46), inherit eternal life in the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world. So, they inherit the kingdom of God. Your doctrine says that these will be people with mortal flesh and blood...

Where have you seen any Amil claim that the bottomless pit is actually the entire earth? Have you seen anyone do that here? If so, do you have a link to where they said this? Where exactly does Revelation 20 clearly show that the bottomless pit is located near (or possibly in) the Earth? Also...

Do you deny that you believe that Mary is the Queen of heaven? Do you deny that you believe that the pope is infallible?

You clearly haven't read the scripture that says not to judge others or you will be judged with the same measure you are judging others. You are judging me here even though you DON'T KNOW ME AT ALL. You are not in a position to tell me who I am putting my trust in. I absolutely put all of my...

You think you did that, but I don't find your arguments to be convincing whatsoever. You have too high of an opinion of yourself. Why would He need to spell that out? Only someone completely lacking in discernment would think that somehow the bread was His actual body and the wine was His...

LOL. You complain about him insulting those he disagrees with after saying "If you only knew how foolish you sound". Okay, Ronald.

With dispensationalism the last trumpet isn't really the last trumpet, the last day isn't really the last day, the end of the age isn't really the actual end of the age. And so on. It's unbelievable. They redefine terms constantly to keep their doctrine afloat.

You take unrelated bits and pieces here and there and try to force them together into one narrative. It's a convoluted mess. And what are you talking about when you talk about some antichrist rising from the dead? Only God can resurrected the dead. Why would God resurrect some antichrist?

This just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. If you read Revelation 6:12-17 you should see that the wrath of the Lamb is already at hand at that point. It's very obvious that Revelation 19:11-21 describes the wrath of the Lamb coming down. How in the world can there be seven years between the...

Go pray to your Queen Mother Mary and worship your supposedly infallible Pope and leave us alone.

No, I was admitting that you are boring me with your ridiculous nonsense.

That is all nonsense of epic proportions. The bread symbolically represented His body and the wine symbolically represented His blood. Simple as that. It's insane to think that He was being literal there.

They killed their bodies, but not their souls. Why do you only focus on physical things? Stop being so naive. The percentage of people who have been saved during the New Testament time period is far higher than it was during the Old Testament time period. That's what you should be thinking...

Amen. It seems that most Premils do not have any clue about the tremendous effect that the gospel of Christ has had on Satan for the past almost 2,000 years. All we need to do to see that is think about how many people in the world were saved before the gospel and how many after. Relatively few...

I agree. That is why I have often rejected your frequent nonsense Speaking of nonsense....do you think the gospel has had no effect on Satan for the past 2,000 years or so?

No, that's more about tearing their case down because they prove to not be trustworthy with their interpretations. Yes, it is. Your rhetoric doesn't do anything to refute that. And his power over people that he once was able to keep as slaves to the fear of death. Don't forget that part. And...

It was a sincere question. I honestly don't know if you believe that the sword coming out of Jesus's mouth is literal or not. If you take the birds eating people's flesh literally, then it seems that you might take all of it literally, including the description of Jesus killing His enemies with...

I wasn't saying it will affect us all. I'm saying that it always has the potential to affect any of Peter and Paul's readers if it happens in their lifetimes. But, if the destruction they describe as coming like a thief in the night won't even come until 1,000+ years after Christ returns, then...

No, He did not. You have to be completely lacking in discernment to think He was saying that literally. What a joke. We don't believe in your false doctrine. We believe in what is taught in scripture.

Yawn....