Search results

There is no indication whatsoever that each of the seven churches represents an age. None! That comes completely from your imagination. They were actual churches that existed in the first century in the ancient Roman province of Asia and there's no basis whatsoever for seeing them as anything...

Who doesn't? Maybe full preterists. Who else? We all accept Revelation 20. We just don't all agree on how it should be interpreted. Okay, so just show a passage showing the rapture followed by a time of tribulation of any duration. Or is that too much to ask?

LOL. Who says otherwise? Not post-tribs. No one does. We have a passage in scripture showing one happening immediately after the other (Matthew 24:29-31). Simple as that. You turn simple things into convoluted things that only you can understand. LOL. No kidding. Who says otherwise? Who...

LOL. I think you could fill up the entire page with the question and he still won't answer it. He knows that the only possible answer is "nowhere", but he doesn't want to swallow his pride and admit that.

Was this childish response really necessary? Are you an adult or not? Was my question too difficult for you? You didn't even bother answering it despite it supposedly relating to beginning Bible basics? If it's something basic then surely you can show me where scripture teaches this, as you...

Amils also believe this, so this is not a reason to be Premil. This also is not a reason to be Premil. Do you think that Amils don't have this same hope? Of course we do! You really need to educate yourself on what Amils believe. I'm wondering if you're confusing full preterists with Amils or...

That you are agreeing with him on this when you apparently disagree with him on everything else maybe should be a red flag? Anyway, you both deny what scripture teaches, which is that the last days refer to the time period generally between the first coming of Christ and the second coming. Why...

I'd like to get an idea of how you understand the timing of things. First, consider this: Revelation 6:12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; 13 And the stars of...

That is true for Amils as well, so that does not prove your view. Do you understand that? You were asked a question that you did not even attempt to answer. I think that is very telling. You do not have scripture to support your pre-trib theory. Pre-trib has no coherent arguments to back it up...

Both passages refer to the last days. Scripture indicates that the last days began already on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:16-21) and they last until the future coming of Christ (2 Peter 3:3-4). So, your attempts to make those passages, which are undeniably related directly to the last days...

You're definitely not getting these ideas from scripture itself. 1 Corinthians 2:7 No, we declare God’s wisdom, a mystery that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. 8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified...

False doctrine results from not being able to differentiate between literal and figurative text. That is your problem. Why you would assume that any given text contained within highly symbolic books like Zechariah and Ezekiel are literal is beyond me. When determining what the living waters...

I went by what you said, so maybe you should be more careful about what you're saying instead of trying to blame me for supposedly not understanding what you said accurately. You are making up a category of people that is not taught in scripture. Instead, scripture indicates that those who are...

Why not? He can be in the air and call fire down from heaven. Why do you not find that to be possible? 2 Peter 3 is about His second coming. That is established in verses 3 and 4 where Peter talks about scoffers in the last days scoffing at the promise of His second coming. Peter indicated in...

It seems to me that you are arrogant and are proud of your own supposed knowledge and wisdom. A sure sign of a false teacher.

Do you think that no Israelite will ever sin again after He returns? What does this even mean? Salvation is always on on individual level. People don't repent and put their trust in Christ as their personal Lord and Savior corporately. Each person does that individually. So, do you believe...

It's clear to me that I don't have anything to learn from you. I was serious that I cannot take you seriously.

Do you think Satan and fallen angels are physical beings? They are not.

Paul said this (I believe he wrote the book of Hebrews): Hebrews 2:14 Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might break the power of him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil— 15 and free those who all their lives were held in...

No, I wouldn't have said it if I thought it doesn't make sense. This is your problem. You are comparing the binding of a spirit being to the physical binding of a human being. But, they're not the same. Of course what I'm saying isn't going to make sense if you assume that Satan's binding is no...