Search results

Stop your lies. I have no reason to listen to you at all. What would it even mean for Him to do God? Is that like playing God? What nonsense. What about the other scriptures I referenced? And there are plenty more. Nothing to say about those?

Jesus Himself taught that His kingdom does not come with observation (Luke 17:20). But davy here teaches that it does come with observation. It's not hard to decide which position to accept.

Where, at any point in Revelation 1-19, does it talk about Christ coming down to the earth as we know it?

You did not specify this in your post. You only referred to Amillennialism in general. You said "the dangers of Amillennial thinking are...". Next time make it clear that this is just your own experience rather than giving the impression that all Amils are that way. Not even close. You must have...

No, he exposed the inconsistency in what you were saying. And now you're embarrassed for contradicting yourself.

The truth is right there in scripture plain as day. John 20:27 Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. 28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.

He's not going to be called something He is not. He is the mighty God as the scripture says! Repent of this shameful denial of the deity of the Lord God Jesus Christ!

You are deceived. I will pray that the Father will convict you of your sin of denying His Son's deity.

I can't fathom how someone who calls himself a Christian could deny the deity of Jesus Christ. Scripture repeatedly teaches that Jesus is God. Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful...

Great point! It is clearly Premil that teaches dangerous things to people, not Amil. Amen. The idea that anyone will get a second chance to repent once Christ returns is simply not taught anywhere in scripture. 2 Thess 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be...

Yes, I asked you the question and you haven't answered it. Is there some reason why you don't want to answer the question? You believe that animal sacrifices will be performed in the future as a memorial of Christ's sacrifice, right? What is this belief based on? Where is it taught in scripture...

Agree. You are very wrong about this. We are not wrong and have no confusion. We agree with the scriptures which clearly teach that Jesus reigns now and that we are priests in His kingdom now (Matt 28:18, Eph 1:19-22, Col 1:13-14, 1 Peter 2:9, Rev 1:5-6). Why is that?

This is absolutely false. I am an Amillennialist and believe God wants all people, including all Jews, to be saved. So, I believe in evangelizing all people, including all Jews. How am I closing my heart to backslidden Jews with my belief? I'm not. I'm very tired of how Amil gets misrepresented...

What are you talking about? I referenced Matthew 24:37-39. If you look at the verse just prior to that then you can see that Jesus indicated that no one knows the day or hour the coming of the Son of man will occur. Yes. No. You are gleaning something from that text that Jesus was not intending...

So, what is your answer to the question I asked? Where does scripture teach that animal sacrifices will be performed in the future as a memorial?

What does this even mean? When I read about a woman sitting on many waters while riding a beast with seven heads and ten horns, what does it mean to just read that and accept what it says? Obviously, no one takes the example I gave literally. I'm just illustrating the folly in what you said...

There's nothing wrong with my attitude. When something as obvious as this is denied by someone, I call that out for what it is. Hebrews 8:6-13 is very obviously about the new covenant, so to deny that just shows your extreme doctrinal bias.

Of course. We all know that. Who said they did? So, where is the scripture which teaches this?

I'm getting the sense that you didn't like me calling you "Dude". Sorry, dude. So, I suppose you wouldn't have any problem with me calling you a fool if I don't mean that disrespectfully? My goodness. You can't even honor a simple request like this. Something is seriously wrong with you. You...

If that's his definition of anti-Semitic then I don't mind being anti-Semitic (according to his definition).