Search results

But those passages talk about animal sacrifices as sin offerings. Why in the world would that happen in the future in light of Christ's "once for all" sacrifice? How do your reconcile your belief in future animal sacrifices with this passage: Hebrews 10:5 Therefore, when Christ came into the...

Exactly. It shows where their priorities lie. Acting as if it's more important to defend their Premil doctrine than to defend the deity of Christ. What a sad state of affairs.

You said He needs to be saved. Saved from what? He was sinless. Who else needs to be saved except for sinners? That is not difficult for me at all. He was a man AND is God. Why do you think He can only be one or the other? Do you not know that it says He would be called Emmanuel because that...

Don't try to speak for all Premills since many of them disagree with a lot of what you believe. They agree with you on the timing of the thousand years in relation to Christ's return and not much else. Where does it say that? Jesus said that unbelievers will be resurrected also. Your problem is...

The Son of Man's kingdom, obviously. Why do you ask? 40 “As the weeds are pulled up and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age. 41 The Son of Man will send out his angels, and they will weed out of his kingdom everything that causes sin and all who do evil. 42 They will throw...

So, you'd rather just "pass" than deal honestly and objectively with the holes I pointed out in your view. I see.

What a ridiculous post. What happens first, as it relates to unbelievers, after He is revealed from heaven, is Him taking vengeance on living unbelievers by physically destroying them. That is clearly taught in other passages of scripture as well. Then after that they will be punished with...

These are the passages I referenced, so I assume you're talking about these: 1 Thess 5:1 But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. 2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say...

What exactly are you not understanding about what I said? Are you familiar with the concept of immortal bodies as Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 15?

LOL. But, is it reasonable to think that is what Revelation 17:12 is saying? I don't believe so at all. Do you have something against the idea of time periods being represented figuratively in scripture or something? In a book like Revelation, why would you not allow for that possibility? That...

I've had it with your false teaching and blasphemy. I'm not going to tolerate this. You need to stop. Jesus is God. He was not created and He did not need to be saved like the rest of us. That would imply He was a sinner like the rest of us! Are you kidding me?! Stop this nonsense!

Here is the verse in question (I think I had said verse 10, but it's verse 12): Revelation 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. You're trying to tell me that the ten horns who have...

Jesus was the first to be resurrected unto bodily immortality. That's what Acts 26:23 is talking about when it says He was the first to rise from the dead. And, what are you talking about when you say "Jesus was the first to receive eternal life"? Are you referring to Him being the first to...

Blah blah blah. You're a broken record.

Yes, McKeever was a Pre-mill--I don't know if he's still alive? No, he died a few years ago, I believe. My mom received that newsletter when I was a kid as well and I used to read it. I've always been post-trib and McKeever was post-trib, so I found his articles to be interesting. I disagree...

No kidding. That is not my point. My point is that His kingdom exists now and did not come with observation. When the kingdom comes with observation at His return that is when He will hand it over to the Father, as Paul wrote about in 1 Corinthians 15:20-28.

Ugh. What a terrible response. Do you think I would have questioned it if I actually saw anything there? Come on yourself. And it shows Him coming down to the earth where? Paul said that we will be meeting Him "in the air", not on the earth. I assume you have read 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17? Where...

LOL. You read all the posts in the discussion, didn't you? How can you not know? Obviously, the contradiction is that you considered the flood, a global destruction event, an act of God's grace and mercy, but said that Him destroying the earth with fire in the future would not be Him showing...

No, it isn't.

I believe that is an interpretation based on doctrinal bias and nothing more. Paul was not talking about something there that he didn't write about elsewhere. He wrote about it mass departure from the faith here as well: 1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times...