Search results

I'm not trying to be rude by saying this, but I can post as much as I want. It's up to you what you want to respond to or not. What I said in post #130. I showed there how Paul indicated that it was the remnant of believers in Israel that were God's chosen, but not the unbelievers. God's chosen...

Who does scripture say are God's people? Galatians 3:26 So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, 27 for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.

What game? So, you don't need to address what I say, but you expect me to address what you say? How is that fair?

You are not obligated to answer them all at once. Take it easy. Take your time. You seem to have the impression that I demanded you respond to all of my posts immediately. Not so.

Will you please read my post again and address what I said by giving me your thoughts on it? After that I will address this post. That is how discussions work.

Would Abraham himself have the same understanding of the fulfillment of the promise as you do? A mere land promise? You have such low standards. God promises much more than that. Have you never read this: Hebrews 11:8 By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his...

Where did Paul say this? What scripture is this based on? Where is this taught in scripture? So, since you believe that Zechariah 14 is about the future and you take it all literally, does this mean you believe that animal sacrifices will be reinstated during that supposed future time? That is...

Please show me where what you said in your second sentence is taught in scripture. Paul certainly did not teach this. Romans 11:1 I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God did not reject his people...

I agree and that's what I was trying to show in my original post. I know my post is pretty long, but it kind of had to be in order to show what Paul was saying in Romans 11:25-27. What he said there summarized what he was saying starting back in Romans 9. Paul had already described an Israel of...

Is it possible for you to specifically address what I said in my post rather than only giving your current understanding?

Interpreting scriptures differently than you is not a case of rejecting and erasing those scriptures. We reject your false interpretations of those scriptures, not the scriptures themselves. So, you're saying His sacrifice is enough for us now, but at some point it won't be enough?! We can...

Hebrews 8:6-13, including verse 10, all relates to the new covenant. So, you're saying the new covenant hasn't been fulfilled (established, placed into effect) yet? Hebrews 8:10 This is the covenant I will establish with the people of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my...

This is just unbelievable, bro. Why did God bother replacing the old covenant with the new covenant if He was just going to restore the old covenant again in the future? Why can't people who believe in this nonsense understand how insulting it is to believe that animal sacrifices will be...

Jesus gave His disciples a foretaste or glimpse of what was going to happen in the future. That is all it was. He was not permanently transfigured there. It was a foreshadowing of His future glorification. You were shown a verse where Jesus Himself said He was not yet glorified at that point...

Are you saying that you believe that God was done temporarily with Israel from 70 AD to 1948? The fact of the matter is that God was never done with Israel, not even temporarily. Romans 11:1 I ask then: Did God reject his people? By no means! I am an Israelite myself, a descendant of Abraham...

You're asking an Amil who doesn't believe in a future Millennium (as no Amils do) if he has any verses that address the future Millennium. LOL.

What will be the purpose of these supposed offerings made in this supposed new temple?

Well, this wasn't very helpful. Again, the things that Jesus was talking about escaping were the things that would literally come upon the entire earth. And He was particularly talking about the things that would happen on "that day" which referred to the day of His second coming and the day...

Are you being purposely ridiculous? They were taken captive to all nations that existed at the time back then. Why do you ask?

No, I have not. You can't even bring yourself to answer yes or no to a simple question. Why is that? Are you calling me a Pharisee and equating yourself with Jesus Christ? That's how this comes across.