Search results

I find you to be very difficult to follow. So, please just answer this question. What time period do you believe is represented in Isaiah 65 verses 18 and 19? The eternal new heavens and new earth or the supposed earthly millennial kingdom after Christ's return? Or some other time period?

I don't understand what you're trying to say here. Matthew 25:31-46 indicates that they are judged right after Christ returns, not 1000+ years later.

My goodness, I don't think you're even trying to understand my point. Did he go on to talk about "the day of vengeance of our God" in verse 3? No. Did he go on to talk about things related to "the year of the Lord's favor" in verse 3? Yes. So, he didn't change the topic from a time relating to...

Yes, I've seen a lot of interpretations and I'm just being honest when I say that your interpretation of Romans 9:6-8 is possibly the worst I've seen. But, probably not. I forgot at the time that a certain poster has maybe even worse interpretations on a regular basis. Anyway, I obviously found...

Sorry, but I just completely disagree with you on this. What more can I say? I've already explained why and nothing you said here changes anything for me. It isn't that Gentiles were turned away and didn't have any opportunity to be saved. That's not what Paul was saying. But, they were at a...

Good grief. I'm sorry, but this is possibly the worst interpretation of a passage that I've ever seen. Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7 Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham’s children. On the...

But, that's exactly what Romans 2:28-29 indicates because Paul specifically said "he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly". So, he was talking about a different type of Jew there than someone who is a Jew outwardly by way of physical circumcision.

The concept of spiritual Israel is there in scripture. Who cares if those actual words are used? What else do you want to call the Israel of which not all of the nation of Israel are part? Romans 9:6 It is not as though God’s word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are...

Don't ever tell me that I don't think scripture means what it says. I always believe it means what it says, but you and I don't always agree on what it means. I disagree with you, not scripture. You've been following the discussion, right? I believe I have clearly explained why I interpret it...

Okay, so that means Isaiah 65:20 is talking about the same thing as verse 19, right? And you already indicated that you believe Isaiah 65:17-19 is about the new heavens and new earth, right? So, that means verse 20 is about the new heavens and new earth as well. So, what are you going to do with...

So, let's say this was the correct way to interpret the passage (even though I still disagree). What could we call this "entirely new type of commonwealth"? Why couldn't we call that something like, say, spiritual Israel?

How about you break Romans 9:6-8 down for me to show exactly how you interpret it instead of just posting this gibberish?

And you can keep your gibberish and incoherent nonsense.

LOL. Who are you trying to kid? You are not fit to teach grammar. Period. Just accept it. I showed how you grammar rule fails in another passage and now you're desperately trying to deny it. I see that you are not good at understanding the meanings of words, either. Did you not take any English...

So, I guess you believe that the 70th week will end 1000+ years after the return of Christ then. Because in your premil view sin is still occurring 1000+ years after the return of Christ.

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this. I'm going to quote the relevant verses here for the benefit of anyone else who might be reading this so that we can see what Paul was saying in terms of not being citizens of Israel and being foreigners (aliens) before Christ came and then...

Don't ever tell me that I don't accept God's view. What is wrong with you? Of course I accept God's view. As wrong as I think you are a vast majority of the time, I still wouldn't tell you that you don't accept God's view. What I don't accept is how Revelation 13:8 is sometimes translated in...

He reigns over all of heaven and earth and has been since His resurrection. He said so Himself (Matthew 28:18). Is there anything confusing about what He said in Matthew 28:18? I never made any such claim. The ones that are alive right now that He reigns over are obviously not dead. You're...

What happens right after Jesus returns and sends fire down on the earth is the judgment, as can be clearly seen in Matthew 25:31-46. You somehow don't have that event happening until 1000+ years later.

I can't think of any reason why He would. Yes, that is very clearly indicated in passages like 2 Peter 3:10-13. Right.