Search results

LOL. You have no spiritual discernment whatsoever. John 5:24-25 talked about a current and ongoing reality (the time is coming AND NOW IS). That has nothing to do with physical resurrection. The bodily resurrection of the dead unto bodily immortality will occur at Christ's return at the last...

I frequently back up my views with scripture. You back up yours with nonsense. If you want to call me a bully for pointing that out, so be it. Maybe you should stop posting nonsense for once and make a coherent argument instead. Literally, physically dead. But, that isn't the issue at hand...

Are you for real? No one is saying that buildings don't have walls and you know it. It was being discussed as to whether or not retaining walls which were not part of buildings with doors and windows are included among the temple buildings that Jesus said would be destroyed. Stop being so...

Exactly. And that is very obvious. Yet, he's still missing it. What possible reason can someone miss something so obvious except for doctrinal bias? Some will go to any length to keep their doctrine afloat. Even to the point of denying that the Olivet Discourse has anything at all to do...

LOL. The first thing the disciples asked when they came up to Jesus on the mount of Olives was "when will this happen?". What else could they have been asking about except for what Jesus had last said not long before that at the temple, which was that the temple buildings standing at that time...

He answered it in Matthew 24:15-22/Mark 13:14-20/Luke 21:20-24, as I've pointed out more than once before. LOL. It's quite clear who is lacking in credibility here. Can you give even one valid reason why Jesus would not have answered that question? Good luck. Except that it did. You take this...

What in the world are you talking about? Don't confuse your opinions with facts. Again, what in the world are you talking about? I never said you didn't use scripture to make your case. I just believe you are interpreting scripture wrongly in some cases. Anyone who is lost is not a Christian...

The word "multitude" is a better translation because it doesn't lead people to draw false conclusions like you do when reading the KJV translation of the verse. But, no, many does not mean "not all". Where are you getting that from? It can be used to refer to many, but not all, of something...

It never portrays the church with immortal bodies in heaven before the seals are open. When the fifth seal is opened John indicated that he saw "the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained.". He only saw their souls because they did...

He declared both in the OD. That's what you're not getting. But, you're not the only one to not recognize that. The first 2 verses where the disciples marvel at the temple buildings and Jesus tells them that the temple buildings will be destroyed occurred just after they went out from the...

That's rich coming from you, the one who butchered the parable in Luke 19:11-26 to make it say that Jesus receives His kingdom when He returns even though Luke 19:12 clearly indicates that the nobleman, representing Jesus, went to a far country, representing heaven, to receive His kingdom...

So, is your answer to my question yes, you do believe in a future judgment day? Do you believe that everyone will be judged when Christ returns at the end of the age, as is portrayed in passages like Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 13:47-50 and Matthew 25:31-46? When I say "judged", I'm not talking...

You're not interpreting that parable correctly. It actually supports Amillennialism. Look at verse 12 more carefully. It says "a certain nobleman", which represents Jesus, "went into a far country", which represents heaven, "to receive for himself a kingdom". That means He received the...

You're apparently not even trying to get my point. What I'm saying is that the text never indicates that he would be bound from persecuting anyone. You were trying to use text that describes him persecuting people as evidence that he can't be bound during that time, but my point is that it...

I ask for scripture that backs up your claim and this is all you can respond with. That says it all about your doctrine.

LOL! How do you come up with this nonsense? You make up your own rules that no one else goes by. Tell me exactly how a SYMBOLIC sword causes "the same physical damage a real sword does"? That makes no sense whatsoever. You're not even thinking here. If something is described SYMBOLICALLY...

The disciples were marveling at certain temple buildings such as the one that they had just been inside of before that. I don't believe they were marveling at any outer walls. Jesus said those buildings that the disciples were marveling at would be completely destroyed and they were. Jesus...

Exactly. Only doctrinal bias can prevent someone from understanding this.

LOL. Where is your proof that any of that is what the disciples were marveling at? Because the context is that it was the temple buildings that the disciples were marveling at in particular that Jesus said would be destroyed. If you want to be hyper-literal and think that Jesus was saying...

What do you make of the following passages then? Daniel 12:2 2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt. John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear...