Search results

You teach replacement theology.

....because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God..... The good 'ol fashioned way.

You did demolish Mark 16:16. You "harmonized" Mark 16:16 into this... He that BELIEVETH and is SAVED shall be baptized. Then you "harmonized" Acts 2:38 to say this... Then Peter said repent and believe for the remission of your sins, and you shall be baptized, and you shall receive the gift...

This is your replacement theology quiz. Or anyone else that wants to take it.... Is this talking about future national Israel or the church..... Hebrews 8 8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel...

Exactly, they were immediately baptized for the remission of their sins after expressing their faith...which is a perfect example of Mark 16:16. Notice, they had not yet received the baptism of the Holy Ghost yet either. This correlated with the 3000 that were added to the church at Pentecost...

Paul came up with the rapture in 1 Thes 4(as he quoted Jesus in Matt 24). Darby was not from the 1st century, nor was he personally acquainted with Paul. Get those facts straight.

You just completely demolished Mark 16:16 with commentary, then attempted to disannul Acts 2:38 without quoting it.. If some sinners asked you, "men and brethren, what shall we do", what would you tell them? Jesus.... 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth...

I lean on believing per Mark 16:16 and Acts 2:38. Even the devils can believe and tremble, but they cannot be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ or be filled with the Holy Ghost.

It starts farther back with other forums for me. I have been unsure for a couple of decades about some of the particular doctrines my church group taught, but found out my suspicions were true on forums. Then I began to test my beliefs and drop or modify them to the Bible as needed(when I saw...

I do. I am simply saying that NOBODY gives the Father the credit for Jesus' earthly works. Jesus did, but nobody else. Folks skip the Father.

You don't agree with the verse in John 14:10? Did Jesus say the Father inside him does His work THROUGH him?

The son gives life this way... 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

When Jesus comes it is after the marriage supper of the lamb....meaning the church was not invited.... 7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready. 8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine...

You are right. And to continue to perpetuate the lie, the commentary gets deeper and deeper. People then become disciples of theologians and commentary and not the Bible only.

When the Holy Ghost is taken, the church is taken..correct?

Scripture says that the Church(Holy Ghost) is holding the antichrist back.... 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his...

I thought Paul taught it first... 15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and...

Yep...Romans 7

No, I challenge the status quo belief system with the Bible.

It says the word of God was with God and was God. It does not say Jesus was with God and was God. How can a singular God be WITH a singular God and be a singular GOD? Also, the KJV says the word was MADE flesh. Not Divine Spirit was made flesh. 3 chapters later per John 4:24, Jesus did not...