Search results

I am only saying baptism is for being saved per Mark 16:16 etc. I consider that an insurance policy of sorts. Those that aren’t saved stand before God at the White Throne in Rev 20. It includes aborted children etc. Folks will be judged according to their works. God will save there too, I am...

I say don’t get baptized for the remission of your sins per Acts 2:38 and you get wrankled. What should I say? It’s all good?

Great post. There is one truth and we are a bunch of schmucks trying to find it. That’s where we all must put away our trained ideas we have and give ourselves a do over at times. That in itself is the hardest thing we can do. In the 70s, as a family member witnessed to me, I told him to...

Okay, don’t get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins. Have it your way. The Lord Jesus should be fine with your sins unremitted and your refusal to be buried with him in baptism.

No, God is telling them to be baptized per those verses. We do it God’s way, not God does it our way.

Mark 16:16 King James Version (KJV) 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Acts 2:38 King James Version (KJV) 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins...

Romans 12:14-21 King James Version (KJV) 14 Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.... Galatians 3:13 King James Version (KJV) 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: This is...

Do any of these verses negate water baptism? Or, are they saying the Holy Ghost is in addition to water baptism?

Cmon bro. Debunk me. Quoting scripture at me to defend yourself is akin to attempt to hold a cross up to a vampire. I’m just not that bad of a guy....I won’t show my fangs.

Don’t throw holy water....debate.

Finding Christ equates debunking Mark 16:16 and Acts 2:38 etc? Christ commanded observation of these things.

You just debunked Mark 16:16 You quoted from the epistles to the saved saints that had by grace been brought though the Acts 2:38 experience. Romans does not debunk Acts. Also, debates are fun to the one that is correct.

Receiving the Holy Ghost does not remit sins, leads a person to the water to remit sins. It still works today. It happened to me in ‘79

The answer to the question. Yes. Mark 16:16. Believing was required to be baptized to be saved.

Notice the Gentiles in Acts 10 getting the same message. If is good enough for them it’s good enough for us

Christ wasn’t resurrected before Acts 8?

Why was the eunuch in Acts 8 baptized in water?

Who’s lecturing who?

The RCC was the first ancient group to tamper with water baptism. The reformers were freaked out about infant baptism so they tossed out the baby with the baptism water. A chill pill and getting back to immersions would have fixed it. The reformers needed reform

Ancient logic prescribed water baptism. The modernist ideology created dust baptism