Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Armour of God

    Crusades Began with Reconquista

    VIVA A RECONQUISTA :woot::woot::woot::woot::woot::woot::woot::woot:
  2. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Explosions reported by the media Explosions reported by fire fighters And above, more people that heard explosions.
  3. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    True. Two pieces of evidence was found in the wreckage that prove demo charges were used. Thermite was found in the wreckage. The only possible explanation for this is the use of demo charges. Molten metal was found in the wreckage. No building or outside fire can melt structural steel. Not...
  4. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    She has a heavy case of confirmation bias. Has no problem watching videos that support her belief but won't dare watch anything that opposes her belief. Just refuses to listen to the other side of the debate. She wouldn't make a very good judge, only listens to one side and then warns me about...
  5. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    It's because he cannot explain how molten metal and thermite was found in the wreckage. That's why he resorts to personal attacks
  6. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Yea the evidence of molten steel and thermite is something that they can't just explain away. It's proof of demo charges
  7. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Molten metal found in the 9/11 wreckage is proof of explosives
  8. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Four major proofs that they can't explain 1 - Physics. The towers came down in a gravitational acceleration. Some sources try to claim its false but thats a lie. It can be very easily calculated. Ohers say the buildings falling energy was enough to cause that, but thats false. According to...
  9. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Well they were also engineers, professors, physicists, scientists and other professionals signing that petition. There were more exerprts than just architects. I find it more interesting that thermite and molten steel was found all over the wreckage. And that no other building has ever free...
  10. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    LoL your right but Jesus is much older news and people are still in debates over him so I'm not surprised.
  11. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Scale. Well on the list was a cargo 747 plane. It's actually a monster compared 767 and it's got 4 engines, not just 2. Also on the list was a Mitchell B-25. It's a military bomber. It's also a monster much bigger than 767. Every variable should be considered. So when witnesses report...
  12. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Thanks for dropping the facts my fellow engineer
  13. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    Thank you for dropping the facts God bless
  14. Armour of God

    Collapse of the twin towers in 2001. An engineering perspective

    His constantly called me ignorant... You show me Deb exactly where I have ever called him any names... I never called him anything