Search results

So you believe that the Judaean Christians fled the "FIRST Resurrection which ONLY occurs at the Second Coming." Can you elaborate? :laughing:

They were fulfilled, once, by the Judaean Christians' flight prior to 70 AD. Nothing present, future, or repeating. "Why do you not believe JESUS".

Why do you not know what you're talking about? I asked in my original post, "Is Matthew 24:15-16 past, present, or future?" You never did answer.

Oh, so Genesis 3:15 is not included in Jesus' Gospel? Where did JESUS say that??? :laughing:

Yes, and it was included in the Gospel taken to the entire inhabited world of Paul's day.

Mark 1:14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God,

Past and present tense when Paul wrote. The Gospel did reach the inhabited world of his time. Acts 2 5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. These heard the Gospel message preached by Peter, and certainly took it back to every nation under...

No reference to any "human temple".

Is Matthew 24:15-16 past, present, or future?

So when Jesus "said unto them" in verse 2, He was only talking to Himself. :laughing: I invite you to provide the name and a verbatim quote from any pre-Darby/Scofield recognized exegete who denies that Jesus was referring to the AD 70 destruction of the temple. You say that "AD70 is nothing...

There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. Matthew 24:2 That's a word. In fact more than one. :laughing:

If they are different time periods, this would mean that Messiah the Prince was cut off twice, the second being in 461 AD. There is no Scripture claiming that Messiah the Prince was the Spirit of Christ, and that the Spirit of Christ was or would be cut off. God preserved His True Church...

More miscomprehension. Why would I repeat your error? :laughing:

That's your miscomprehension attempting to decapitate the 70th week.

Who said it does?

Your mouse is crippled. :laughing: "To cut off" is the proper definition in OT Hebrew. ◄ 2852. chathak ► Strong's Exhaustive Concordance determine A primitive root; properly, to cut off, i.e. (figuratively) to decree -- determine. Topical Lexicon Divine Delimitation of Time Daniel 9:24...

You obviously didn't follow the links I posted. So follow them. :laughing:

The Scriptural definition for "determined" in Daniel 9:24 is "cut off". You should use Scriptural rather than temporal definitions. 2852 [e] neḥ·taḵ נֶחְתַּ֥ךְ are determined V‑Nifal‑Perf‑3ms The 70 weeks were "cut off" in the 70th week when Messiah perfectly and completely fulfilled Daniel...

If there is no fulfillment, there is nothing which has been determined. But the 70 weeks are fulfillled, and thus are also determined. The remainder of your post consists of your personal private opinions, conjectures, presumptions, and speculations. Unless you can show at least some support...

The Bible does not say what you say. I believe the Bible. Titus credited God. You don't. I believe Titus. So exhume and excoriate Titus. :laughing: Yours is. Messiah's isn't. Learn the meaning of determined.