Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    The Romans were under the command and control of Messiah, the "He" who made Jerusalem desolate in Daniel 9:27. Titus himself acknowledged God's assistance. Did you miss that in post 513? Here it is again: "We have certainly had God for our assistant in this war, and it was no other than God...
  2. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    So they desolated themselves all by themselves? :laughing:
  3. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Of the more than 50 English Bible versions, which other one(s) translate to "at the end of time"?
  4. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Matthew 23 38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. Whom did Jesus use to desolate Jerusalem and the temple? So are the previous 69. Yours is. Thank God, Messiah's isn't. Daniel understood determined.
  5. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    From the site, the Romans destroyed infrastructure and inhabitants, and the Jews destroyed inhabitants. You're still ignoring the grammar in Daniel 9:25-27, which is unsurprising, as it destroys dispensationalized delusion. Messiah the Prince confirmed His New Covenant in the fulfilled...
  6. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Evidence from the Jews themselves: "While the Romans would have won the war in any case, the Jewish civil war both hastened their victory and immensely increased the casualties. One horrendous example: In expectation of a Roman siege, Jerusalem's Jews had stockpiled a supply of dry food that...
  7. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    The Jews were as responsible as the Romans for the destruction of Jerusalem. Both Jews and Romans were the people of Messiah the Prince to accomplish His purposes of judgment and destruction. The grammar doesn't change.
  8. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    The grammatical referent of "prince" in Daniel 9:26 is "Messiah the Prince" in Daniel 9:25. Messiah is the only prince in the passage, and identifies Him as being "he" in Daniel 9:27. Which invalidates the fallacy of any antichrist, and of any antichrist confirming any covenant. Because...
  9. C

    Two Gatherings at Jesus' Coming

    Only the spiritual remnant in Christ of physical Israel will be saved. Isaiah 10:22; Romans 9:27 Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all...
  10. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Why do you continue to avoid the grammar? Yes, and His Blood validated i.e. confirmed, His New Covenant. The term "antichrist" is not in the Daniel 9:27 text. The term "Sinai" is not in the Daniel 9:27 text. Absolutely fulfilled. They are the final determined week of the 70 determined...
  11. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    The grammar has nothing to do with time duration. Please try again. And there's nothing "differently" about Matthew 26:28 because it confirms the New Covenant, and thus confirms Daniel 9:27. Please try again. The Scriptures defend themselves. The historical orthodox Christian Church...
  12. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    I said nothing about duration or time. I asked you to identify who "he" in Daniel 9:27 is, based on grammar and Matthew 26:28. Please try again.
  13. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    So you accept the reality of the New Covenant, but claim that in Daniel 9:27 it is a "word game". Is the New Covenant a "word game" in Matthew 26:28? In Matthew 26:28, who declared that His Blood was the Blood of His New Covenant, thus confirming, i.e. validating, that Covenant? Daniel 9:27...
  14. C

    Two Gatherings at Jesus' Coming

    They claim that the Church is the heavenly bride and Israel is the earthly bride. But they never admit that their Jesus is a polygamist. :laughing: Amens in laying it on the line, bro.
  15. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    The Covenant Confirmer's New Covenant and Blood are no game. But They defeated your game at Calvary.
  16. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Why don't you say "No one here is denying the Covenant Confirmer's New Covenant and Blood"?
  17. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    Focus on the consequences of denying the Covenant Confirmer's New Covenant and Blood.
  18. C

    Not a future seeing Jesus coming guy

    You've lost your game of trying to contort Christ into antichrist. Messiah the Prince won, 2,000 years ago. At Calvary. Daniel 9:24-27; Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25
  19. C

    Two Gatherings at Jesus' Coming

    You have no interest in that which extols and glorifies Christ and His Church. So just leave it for those who do.
  20. C

    Two Gatherings at Jesus' Coming

    Sure we do. They and we have been doing it ever since the "church in the wilderness" Acts 7:38. The Church and the 144,000 Revelation 7:3-4 describe the 144,000 as “sealed.” That description is reserved in the NT for believers in Christ – His Body and Bride – His Church: 2 Corinthians...