Search results

No. Did Paul correct Jesus? No. I have given you everything from Him who sent Paul, it is enough.

No, Jesus defined it as blaspheming (disrespecting) the Holy Spirit. He said that because scribes were being disrespectful to Him, and He was warning them that a time was coming when men would be subjected to the Holy Spirit, and what they were doing would have eternal consequences. That time...

I have no "sect", but Christ only. He is our Teacher, and those who are appointed by Him to teach, do not teach what is their own, nor by their own understanding, but what is His by keeping silent in church that the Holy Spirit might speak, as is the order of the day. As for knowing the truth...

Because the same example that water baptism is pointing to the one actual baptism with the Holy Spirit, would need to be shown to these many generations until the end. But every messages to be taught, is summarized in these few words: "Let your light shine." Which is to say, such practices as...

What are you trying to say? Your post is not clear, but fragmented. Can you explain?

You are right to say you do not understand me. But no, I do not redefine God's word, except that which is wrongly defined and therefore misunderstood.

Yeah...that pretty well sums it up...and it's going to get you in trouble.

In reality, it is you who have spoken "ignorantly." So that you will know when the real truth comes out that not everyone was fooled (as you apparently have been): Trump was not telling Netanyahu that everyone hates Israel, as you assume. He was saying that Israel's people (the descendants of...

Yeah, maybe he agrees with you and you can "Like" him. How fun!

I made a [true] statement, and then asked if anyone has experienced it differently that they might list it differently. Meaning, I am not exempt--I was simply first.

"Now-and-not-yet" is wrong, because back "then" (that former time) when Paul wrote the "now we see dimly" passage, and "now" (this present time) serve different purposes appointed by God. So, you grouping it all together as if that same principle applies both then and now, means you are stuck in...

Please note: If you continue to mince my every post in mid-sentence pieces...at some point I am just not going to respond anymore. What changes? Oh, just the advent, crucifixion, and ascension of Christ, His teachings and gospel, Him overcoming the world and being given all power in heaven and...

Which makes your "different sense", nonsense. Before God.

Your scripture quote is from the historic time of Christianity on the cusp. Meaning, it was written to both those before and after many great changes...and so it is wrong for you to sight what was true of some then, with what is true of others not--or even others then. Do you not see that Paul's...

That is better...but [as it is written] that eliminates water baptism, leaving only the "one" Holy Spirit baptism of Jesus ("eph 4:5 baptism").

That is all merely the teachings of men, only part of which is biblical. Other parts are actually Antichrist.

That is a lie.

Bless you! However, when things become unavoidably in our face...God usually has a reason behind it. Not unlike the whole rainbow pride scene which has been God reminding us of His promise not to destroy the earth ever again by water (because He is now doing it now with Holy fire), the homeless...

Religious practices performed and yet not fully understood for centuries have purpose--but not saving purpose in and of themselves. Not unlike the Law which did not and cannot save, but only pointed to sin and the need for a Savior, water baptism also was and is simply a light unto the nations...

What's your point?