Search results

You are adding to what is written--not commentary--but completely adding a replacement theory to the clear definition of blaspheme against the Holy Spirit by Jesus, the Word of God. Which is a classic example of believing "the teachings of men" rather than believing God.

Again, your heart and effort are in the right place--but "For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him”, is what is biblically true. And again, all of what you are saying is indeed true--if--it is attributed only to the new spirit of God...

There is no contradiction, except that you see things different than they are: as if Paul defined blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and not Jesus. Like I said, that is antiChrist.

That is a lie.

Yes, but I am not going to. You have the information, and will answer for yourself.

You are quoting the difference I have been speaking of, and what you have not acknowledged: That it is the body of sin and death that is "the servant of sin", while "the Son" "a life-giving spirit"--not that flesh body of sin--"abideth ever." The scriptures speak of two different bodies, one...

Jesus proving you wrong has already been posted.

You list what you want. But you are making up your own false doctrine, not according to what Jesus, who gave the terms of blaspheme, said. By definition...that is antiChrist.

On the contrary, it is "rightly dividing the word of truth" and only twaddle to the natural man. For "the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." As for working out your own...

It very well could be. But Paul made sure to also include everything he ever said that was not written there...which is a bunch. But do her yourself...you are speaking of spiritual things, not things of the flesh. That difference resides in two different bodies, and just as Christ bore our sins...

That is not a proper understanding of winning the race set before us. What is set before us is Christ, and for those born again of the spirit of God, it means remaining in this body of death with our new spirit body within to struggle and endure to the end, while doing the good works of Christ...

You don't see it, but you have answered yourself--greater works of the Spirit...are of the Spirit, not of the flesh, not of the old body of sin and death. As for Judgement Day, if we walk and work now in the flesh, we will only begin to walk in the Spirit after the Judgement, and miss out on...

It shall be as it is written. But you have unsoundly not included all of what is written...and that is written of also--you even quoted it.

No, it's a written, quoted, recorded "thing."

The Law taught that it was impossible. Making no provision for the flesh is good regarding making sin a provision, but even God has made provision for the flesh. By which we workout (walkout) our own salvation--which is not to say--we do anything to save ourselves--but rather that we are...

Good point! For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees? Romans 8:24 Unfortunately, Paul goes on to speak figuratively as if referring to one body that is transformed and made new. But he also teaches the opposite, and we are...

You are doing everything right...but still you are not fully understanding. Converting the flesh into would-be righteousness is not the task at hand. The gospel of Christ Jesus is to be a completely new and different spirit body creation born of the spirit of God--not a whitewash of the flesh...

No, you have effectively closed the door at Christ's knocking ("Behold I stand at the door and knock..."). Which speaks of those born again of the spirit of God, the first resurrection, in whom it is no longer they/we who live but Christ. All who are actually born again of the spirit of God...

With the advent of the Holy Spirit speaking through people by the order of Christ Jesus, for 2,000 years we have walked in a spiritual minefield, not unlike unknowingly entertaining angels. Does that mean no grace? No, but in some cases, yes, because that warning from Christ was not an empty...

You cannot disrespect, then claim "no disrespect." Not anymore, not for 2,000 years, not with the Holy Spirit speaking.