Search results

More avoidance! You have to. The Book exposes your doctrine!

LOL. I did. You avoided every point in the response, as you do. This avoidance sends a clear statement out to the reader: Pretribs cannot deal with the facts. We all know why: the doctrine does not add up. It cannot be supported by other Scripture. Where is a future rapture mentioned in...

You spiritualize the literal and literalize the spiritual.

Here we go again. I thought we had put this error to bed. • First of all, the king of Tyrus was still alive here when this was being spoken. • Second, the king of Babylon is rebuked for his pride and rebellion at the beginning. He was definitely not in the Garden of Eden. According to the...

I am coming to the conclusion you are just throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks. It is clear: you cannot support these arguments.

Present Scripture that shows a rapture of the Church followed by a trib followed a Pretrib 3rd coming?

Where does it say the rapture takes us to heaven?

You throw limp arguments on the table and then run, knowing that they are untenable. I actually thought this one was actually abandoned by Pretribs and then you regurgitate it. Revelation 4:1-2 has absolutely nothing to do with a secret rapture. In fact, note what it actually says and how it...

You guys are on the ropes with your false teaching. You cannot address the truth. It exposes your Jesuit teaching. It is amusing to watch you guys run for the hills and hide. Talk about cowardice. Checkmate!!!

LOL. No wonder! You have to. You cannot address them. They demolish your error.

And?

Revelation 4:1-2 has absolutely nothing to do with a secret rapture. In fact, note what it actually says and how it compares to similarly worded passages in Revelation. Remember, the safest way to understand Scripture is to compare Scripture with Scripture. Revelation 4:1-2 commences, “After...

Where is the "Church" mentioned here? Revelation 4:1-2 is describing John being caught up in the Spirit 2000 years to receive the unveiling. This is therefore historic, not future.

Lol. So, anyone who disagrees with what you teach should be avoided? How arrogant! How delusional! What a load of nonsense. We all disagree on this forum. That is not what it's talking about. This is all a smokescreen to mask you having no answer to the simple biblical questions. The ironic...

They are unable to present any rapture passage that teaches a trib following. They have nothing. Pretrib is so fractured now in locating a future Pretrib rapture in Revelation that they take each other out with their posts. Few even try and presnt Revelation 4:1 as an argument. They have final...

Their fight is with Scripture!

That is his nature. He thinks he has the right to judge everyone. He dumps people to hell because they disagree with his theology. It is pointless reasoning with him. He's no interest in proveing his theology in the Bible. It is not there. It is a Jesuit invention.

I'm done talking to you until you apologize, act like a Christian, stop judging people's salvation and start addressing Scripture instead of hurling ad hominem.

Keep your false accusations to yourself. Thankfully you are not God or most of us would be damned. The scary part is, the judgment you meet at on us is met back on you some day. All you have is ad hominem.

What other Scripture in the Bible teaches that Jesus is coming on a literal physical white horse?