Search results

No, Jay. You still haven't answered the question: Where did JESUS define “this generation” as 1,024 solar years? Now you've moved to Matthew 16:28, which doesn't even contain the word genea. That verse says nothing about: three generations, three ages, three Days of the Lord, or 1,024 solar...

You just demonstrated the entire problem in one post. I asked you one very simple question: Where did JESUS define “this generation” as a 1,024-year prophetic age? Not: Where can you build a chronology? Not: How many solar years can you calculate from Isaac? Not: How many passages can you...

When you said “When doctrine corrects Christ, it’s satanic!” you said a mouthful, let me tell you. If you projected any harder, you might split the earth in half. You keep warning everyone else about judgment while defending a system that, by your own standard, silences Christ, corrects...

The only thing I’ll remember is watching a misled, fear-driven prophecy system manufacture exactly the nightmare it keeps warning everyone about. You keep pointing to chips, tattoos, cashless systems, wars, and headlines as though panic itself proves the doctrine. It doesn’t. Fear is not...

Yea, lets get it all out Jack... Your system created this nightmare; not God’s Word. It taught generation after generation to reinterpret Christ through headlines, wars, modern geopolitical Israel, technology, and fear, then call the result “what Jesus meant.” Christ said “this generation.”...

No kidding. I’ve been trying to explain that to you for fifteen pages. If “doctrine correcting Christ” is satanic, then you’ve already stated the punchline. Thats exactly the problem. Your doctrine makes Christ say things He never said, relocates His words to people He never identified, and...

I was too cordial up above in this section, so let me rephrase it to make sure the point is understood. "Then children grow up hearing the shorthand from parents, pastors, study Bibles and prophecy teachers generation after generation until eventually nobody hears: “Here's an OUTRAGEOUS...

The reason this system is so hard to unlearn when somebody is raised in it is that eventually the system stops sounding like a system. Its conclusions become shorthand. “Daniel’s seventieth week.” “The Church Age.” “The prophetic clock.” “Tribulation saints.” “Rightly dividing.” And on and...

So instead of answering: 1. Where does Scripture say Matthew 25 belongs to a different salvation program? 2. Where does Scripture say future tribulation believers can lose salvation? 3. Where does Scripture say Christ’s teaching is reassigned to another dispensation? …you recommend a...

Now “this generation” means 1,024 solar years? Where does Jesus say that? Matthew 24:34 says: “THIS generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” It doesn't say: “This 1,024-year age.” It doesn't say: 96 days + 1,000 years + 24 years = the definition of generation. It...

Jack, the accusation is very simple to clear up. Forget the first sentence entirely. Show the Scripture for these claims: 1. Matthew 25 belongs to a different salvation program. 2. Future tribulation believers can lose salvation. 3. Christ’s teaching is reassigned to another dispensation...

I think post #236 covered that pretty well already from my perspective.

And Revelation 12:11 is true. It still doesn't say: Paul alone governs Christians today. Matthew 25 belongs to a different salvation program. Tribulation believers can lose salvation. Christ’s words must be reassigned to another dispensation. You keep quoting true verses that do not state...

Your system.. Makes Christ fallible. Makes Christ wrong about the timing of His own prophecy. Makes His own words bend until they finally fit your system. And if Christ can be wrong about His own prophecy, then your theology has created a Christ who is not infallible; which strikes at the...

Jack, we've now gone from insults, to “gay agenda,” to calling me Satan. And through all of it, you still haven't produced the Book. Chapter. Verse. Calling the person asking for Scripture “Satan” is not an argument. It's what happened when the argument ran out. Still waiting. Book...

Correct, Jack. This thread is not about gays. You made it about gays because you still can't answer the actual question. Nobody asked you about sexuality. You were asked for Book. Chapter. Verse. Instead of producing it, you introduced “gay agenda,” called me a troll, and told me to go away...

Calling me a troll and inventing a “gay agenda” still does not produce the Book. Chapter. Verse. You were asked to prove your theology from Scripture. You still haven't. Every time the question gets tighter, the answer gets more personal and the Scripture gets more absent. That's becoming...

Still waiting Jack.. Book. Chapter. Verse. >

A Baphomet statue is easy to recognize. A theology that quietly makes Christ fallible while claiming to defend Him is far more dangerous.

I'm sorry Jack, but if you can't produce a single Book. Chapter. Verse. to corroborate the central claims of this dangerous theology, then I have no reason whatsoever to treat it as biblical. Nor should anyone else. Calling an analogy “gay” does not magically turn your assumptions into...