Search results

Christ is coming to the Mount of Olives alright, to judge. And when He does, you won’t need a Scofield chart to figure out where He is; you’ll be able to see the flash from Pluto.

The most dangerous system is not the one that openly denies Christ’s words. It's the one that teaches you to distrust their plain meaning while convincing you that this distrust is faithfulness. And once you must learn the system before you're permitted to understand what Christ “really meant,”...

And now, of course, the sudden, horrifying realization sets in... “What if the thing I thought was protecting Christ was actually teaching me to look straight past the evidence that vindicated Him?” “What if the entire system I was using to keep Jesus from being wrong was built on denying the...

Eusebius Pamphili, Bishop of Caesarea Maritima — the great fourth-century historian of the Church, theologian of the age of Constantine, guardian of the earliest surviving history of Christianity, and traditionally acclaimed the "Father of Church History" — looked back at Christ’s prophecy and...

See, this is the point where they’re huddled up going: “It cannot be! We KNOW Tom Hanks’s character is really a WOMAN pretending to be a man! SO how is he doing this?!?!” Because if Tom Hanks’s character is actually just a man, then 10,000 dispensational adventures about this mysterious woman...

You're denying that Jesus Christ fulfilled the prophecy He gave His own disciples, even if you don't realize that's what your theology is doing. This alone is absolutely staggering. The early Church recognized the destruction of Jerusalem as a fulfillment of Christ’s prophecy while continuing...

You were already completely turned-out in post #176 in this thread absolutely unrecoverable.. Anyone with a molecule of critical thinking reading that post and then reading your comments won't even be able to sleep tonight because the Christological 5 alarm fire should be obvious to anyone.

Well? So should we go with: A: Christ was really talking to His own disciples and meant what He said read plainly. Christ did not mislead His followers as they saw the prophecy fulfilled in AD 70 within "THIS GENERATION". Christ was not mistaken about the timing of His own prophecy...

For what? Trying to save people's eternal souls? Still waiting btw... Where did Jesus identify another generation as “this generation”? Book. Chapter. Verse. > ^ I hope you can produce it soon, otherwise Christ is a fallible teacher and not the Son of God. And that is a very serious...

^ This really just can't be topped as a 12 year old would get it... For Gen X and older.. It’s like your parents and their entire theological system brainwashed you into believing that Tom Hanks and his friend in Bosom Buddies are REALLY WOMEN; not men dressed as women. So you grow up...

Shepherdsword, I affirm the future return of Jesus Christ. I am not denying Acts 1 or the resurrection of the dead. What I'm challenging is your assumption that every reference to Christ coming on the clouds must describe that same final event. You quoted Matthew 24:30, Acts 1:9–11, and...

Christ came in judgment against Jerusalem in AD 70, just as He warned that generation. That doesn't mean every prophecy of His final return was fulfilled. Your question assumes every reference to His coming must describe the same event. That's the trick. Isaiah 19:1 describes the LORD coming...

Yes, it's “easy” when your manmade system is allowed to override God's Word. You were already answered in posts #173, #175, and #178, and now you're back presenting the same assumption as though none of those replies happened. We've been over this. Christ doesn't tell you who He was talking...

Jack, you're going to need more reinforcements. Get Hagee, the ghost of Darby, and the entire prophecy conference committee in here tomorrow when I'm back online. Bring the charts, the timelines, the maps, and the 1948–1967 calculator. Maybe between all of you, somebody can finally find the...

Jack, you've now quoted Zechariah 14, Acts 1, Revelation 13, the Mount of Olives, the mark of the beast, and modern Israel. And after all of that, you still haven't answered the question. Where did Jesus identify 1948, 1967, or any future generation as the “this generation” of Luke 21:32? You...

Jesus Christ is not fallible. Jesus Christ was most certainly not mistaken about His own prophecy. Jesus Christ did not deceive His own followers. And Jesus Christ was most certainly not speaking to your generation 2,000 years later when He said “this generation.” You're taking your...

Jesus says: “Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.” You insert: 1948. 1967. Modern Israel. Then you quote: “This generation will by no means pass away till ALL THINGS take place.” And apparently that now means the generation living after...

As easy as 1, 2, 3.... “Here we observe yet another previously overlooked dispensation: the Honeymoon Cloud City Incident, during which Chewbacca became intoxicated, destroyed Lando’s bar, and caused great distress to his new bride Princess Leia, who was ultimately forced to bail him out of...

The critical thinkers in here are besides themselves.. . "Jesus said: YOU. THESE THINGS. THIS GENERATION. Your answer is essentially: “Yes, but my interpretation of His coming makes that impossible.” Exactly. You said the quiet part out loud. And what does that tell you? You're correcting...

Exhausting.. No, you're still just repeating the premise that created the problem. You're saying: “Jesus could not have meant that generation because I believe His coming must still be future.” That's not an answer. That's your system's interpretation of the coming being used to override...