Search results

And because that verse will never be found in the text, eventually you have to ask a much darker question.. how much spiritual danger are you in when your entire system has drifted so far from the actual words of Christ that deception starts feeling like doctrine? You trusted the schisms. You...

Exactly, he could not produce the verse because it does not exist. There is no explicit verse where Christ says “this generation” means an unnamed generation 1,900 years later. Not even just "in the future". Not even that to hold onto for an argument. Nothing. See the danger is that once...

We’re all still patiently waiting for the verse where Christ Himself identifies the future generation you claim He meant by “THIS generation." Book. Chapter. Verse please...

No. You just repeated the same unsupported substitution that’s been going on throughout the thread.. You're not saying anything new.. Christ said: “THIS generation shall not pass.” You changed it to: “the generation that sees.” Fine. Show me where Christ says those are two different...

No, you still haven’t produced it. Christ said: “THIS generation shall not pass.” You say He meant some other generation thousands of years later. Fine. Show me where He names it. Not “TO and ABOUT" gymnastics. Not your paraphrase. Not “see post #21.” Book. Chapter. Verse. Until then...

You still didn’t answer the question. You replaced Christ’s words with your paraphrase and then asked me to defend the paraphrase. Jesus said: “THIS generation shall not pass…” You say: “an unnamed future generation shall not pass…” So once again: Where does Jesus identify that second...

While we’re at it. Revelation gives us one victorious appearing of Christ. Show me where John splits that return into two separate arrivals. Book. Chapter. Verse. Show me where John backs up your modern, manmade 'Left Behind" fairytale. He never does. That second arrival has to be...

You keep warning that Satan is coming while supporting the very fear, war, bloodshed, and political machinery you say will herald his arrival. At some point you have to ask whether the ‘signs’ you’re terrified of are being manufactured by misled people who’ve been trained to interpret the...

No. “TO” and “ABOUT” are not two generations. They are two prepositions you're using to smuggle a second generation into the passage after the fact. Jesus is speaking to His disciples about events. Fine... Now produce the verse where Christ identifies some completely different future generation...

Your analogy only works if the text already contains two possible generations, the way your example already contains two possible women. It doesn’t, you supplied the second generation yourself and then called the resulting ambiguity “language usage.” Show me where Jesus introduces that second...

Correct. Now compare the two inferences. One says “this generation” means the generation Jesus is actually speaking to in the discourse. The other says “this generation” means some completely different generation thousands of years later, in a galaxy far, far away on the other side of the...

You're confusing Christian humility toward Jews with Christian submission to Judaism. Romans 11:18 says don't boast over the branches. It does NOT say Judaize, submit to the Mosaic covenant, or treat Judaism as Christianity's doctrinal authority. And stop trying to turn Ignatius into an ethnic...

If you're an atheist, lukewarm Christian, or lurker who isn't familiar with the word “inference,” it simply means a conclusion someone claims they're "drawing from the evidence"; it does not mean the conclusion is true AT ALL. That's how the dispensationalist shell game begins; one unsupported...

Wrangler just conceded my entire point: “Never explicitly says it. It’s called an inference.” Exactly. Jesus explicitly says: THIS generation. The future generation is your inference. And Lizbeth, “first the natural, then the spiritual” still doesn't say Matthew 24 happens twice. You're...

Yeah, I know, I've been saying that for 2 pages.. You were taught that “this generation” means “the future generation that sees all these things.” Problem is, Jesus never says that. He says: “When YE shall see…” “When YE shall see all these things…” “THIS generation shall not pass, till...

You already conceded the point: Christ warned THEM. “This generation” meant THEM. Jerusalem fell. The Temple came down in AD 70. Now you're trying to resurrect the prophecy after it was fulfilled. Where did Jesus say: “And then I will fulfill all of this AGAIN, thousands of years later, upon...

That doesnt solve the problem. It dodges it. “All these things” tells us what events are in view. It doesn't tell us who “this generation” is. You can spend ten pages arguing about wars, signs, tribulation, stars, temples, kingdoms, or anything else contained in “all these things,” and when...

Somewhere in a holler in Tennessee, 1956... “Hey Jebediah, did ya hear the news about Jesus Christ feeding the 5,000?!” Jebediah: “I sure didn’t! What are you talking about?!” “Oh my gosh, Jebediah; Jesus predicted the American interstate highway system!” Jebediah: “HE DID WHAT?!”...

This is what would happen if you let Scofield near Star Wars. It wouldn’t look the same. Once the system gets hold of the source, the source is no longer allowed to speak plainly. And once that happens, the system can make the source say anything it wants. All you need is enough "notes" to...