Search results

You just stated the problem more clearly than I ever could. “If he didn't then we know that the generation he was referring to was not the one of 70ad.” No. What you actually mean is: “Because I've already decided what Christ's coming must look like, I know ‘this generation’ cannot mean the...

To the lurkers who are absolutely terrified and rightly so; asking - "How could this have possibly happened!?!" Very easily. Give a theological system a hundred years to reproduce itself through pulpits, prophecy conferences, study Bibles, radio, television, and family tradition, and...

Jesus returning in glory does not magically make YOU the “this generation” He was speaking to. That’s the entire sleight of hand in the system.. You're taking one event you believe is still future and using it to transfer Christ’s audience 2,000 years forward. But even if verse 27 is future...

If you were born in 1997, read Lincoln saying in 1861, “when this generation has passed away,” and then insisted with a straight face that Lincoln meant YOU standing here in 2026, the problem would no longer be interpretation. It would be that some outside system had so thoroughly colonized your...

You’re not giving me context. You’re handing me your system’s prefab conclusion, stapling the word “context” to it, and expecting that to settle the argument. Luke 21:27 says: “then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.” Fine. But your argument is...

You just assumed the very thing you were supposed to prove. Luke 21 does NOT say: “A future generation thousands of years from now, when THEY see these things…” Jesus says: “WHEN YE see these things…” Then: “THIS generation shall not pass away…” And just before that: “When YE shall see...

You just denied the generation is transferable and then immediately transferred the expectation to your own generation - “most of us believe it is not far away now.” Thats exactly the mechanism. And Romans 2:8–11 doesn't say Israel was judged in AD 70 while the Gentile world waits thousands...

Computer, please show me what a dangerous, perpetually transferable ‘this generation’ eventually becomes. What does that look like? And please explain the danger itself. "Once “this generation” is detached from the generation Jesus actually addressed and is made permanently transferable...

I asked for two verses proving the doctrine you keep calling 'biblical truth.' Not twenty, not a dissertation. Two. Your answer? “WELCOME TO MY IGNORE LIST.” That response speaks volumes. You weren’t asked for Scofield, Darby, charts, notes, or commentary. You were simply asked: WHERE...

Davy, now we need TWO Book. Chapter. Verse answers from you. #1. Where does Jesus say “this generation” means a generation thousands of years in the future? #2. Where does Jesus say that after one supposed “this generation” dies, the prophecy can simply be reassigned to the next generation...

No, Davy. You’re doing it again. I asked: Where does Jesus say “this generation” means some other generation thousands of years later? You answered by telling me I must first understand your system of “signs,” Revelation 6, and the future Second Coming. Thats not an answer. Thats the...

No, thats not what I said at all. I did not say everything in Matthew 24 and 25 already happened. In the very post you quoted, I said: “We can debate where the discourse broadens into final judgment.” So please don’t manufacture a position for me and then accuse me of “pushing aside”...

No. Matthew 25:31–46 has not already happened, I take that as the final judgment. But notice what just happened. You moved from Matthew 24:34 - “this generation” to a later passage about final judgment and then treated the later passage as though it changes who “this generation” was. That's...

Those are fair questions. But neither verse makes “this generation” disappear. Matthew 24:29–31 uses classic prophetic judgment language, darkened sun, falling stars, shaken heavens; the same kind of imagery Isaiah and Ezekiel use for the collapse of nations. So simply quoting those verses...

To the lurkers, it's akin to this... (except with words alone, like in the Bible, you can hide the trick far more easily.) Dispensation I — The Hidden Chewbacca Covenant Leia appears to be speaking romantically to Han. The uninstructed viewer naturally assumes the scene concerns Han and Leia...

At this point it’s like arguing with David Koresh that he isn’t Jesus Christ. The more directly you challenge the premise, the more the premise simply gets repeated back at you as proof of itself. ‘Israel is still uniquely privileged because Israel is Israel; Jesus will fight for them because He...

It's like living in a science fiction horror movie from hell. This system has trained you to reason, defend and argue in categories Christ Himself rebuked. If your theology trains you to reason like the very people Christ rebuked for trusting ancestry, inherited status, and covenant...

^ This guy is basically saying, ‘Yes, they may currently reject Christ, but they are still prophetically My people Israel; God restored them nationally first, and He will regenerate them later.’ But the New Testament does not give unbelief that kind of covenant protection at all. Paul says...

To the lukewarm who might be confused, even if you were stranded alone on a desert island in the South Pacific, if you belong to Christ, Israel is still there. Not because the sand became holy. Not because you found the right coordinates. Because the covenant people are in Christ. And know...