Search results

That makes ZERO sense. It was how Paul got saved, how the Ethiopian eunuch got saved, how the Jews got saved on the day of Pentecost, and how we too get saved

That's dumb. Baptism is a command to be obeyed, clear and simple. Mk 16:15-16 15And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. 16He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. The Lord’s own words...

Who said that, that's ridiculous, but you must contact the blood and we're baptized into his death and it was at his death that his blood was shed

Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

1 Peter 3:21 21The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ: Not alone though 1. Belief and faith 2. Repentance 3. Confession of belief as...

In the Greek it's actually IN one Spirit, not BY one Spirit. There is a difference. And the only way sin is removed is by water baptism which is also the point at which a person becomes a member of the body of Christ. Acts 2:38-47

Being baptized into the body of Christ, immersed in water, is something we agree on. Scripture says by doing so, we receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, so, to me that means it's the indwelling of the Holy Ghost within us, as opposed to the spirit falling on individuals such as it did in Acts 2...

If you're in sin, you're lost, and there's only one scriptural remedy to remove sin and that's by water baptism, immersion in water

One Lord, one faith, one baptism, and it's by water going back to John's baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.

In summary. Its not by the Spirit, which infers and could oddly be used to support the false doctrine of modern day baptism BY the Spirit, but it's "in" the Spirit as the original Greek correctly states, meaning or inferring and supporting being baptized into Christ not by the Spirit, but into...

You must first have a clear understanding of the text and context of the Corinthian letter and scriptures you mentioned. The letter was written to the church at Corinth and related to them at that point in time, as is the case with all such scriptures, i.e.: the Roman letter, Ephesian letter...

Acts 2:47 47Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved The Lord adds to the church. And the Holy Spirit fell on the 11 apostles in Acts 2 as Joel prophesied and as restated by John the Baptist, afterwhich the 11 spoke in...

9 of the 10 are restate in tge NT

Your 1st paragraph is flawed logic and totally unscriptural which is why reading beyond is meaningless. The scriptures teach we're baptized into Christ and thereby become part of hus body which is his church. Has nothing to do with modern day denominations created by man.

If Philip preached Christ to the eunuch, he preached everything related to Christ and his salvation including the absolute need for baptism as part of the salvation process. Read the entire text.

The one and only gospel saves as was preached by Philip to the Ethiopian eunuch. Notice the words in Paul's Romans 15 statement, and also note that there are no idle or insignificant words used in scripture; even the very smallest of words you'd generally consider to be insignificant are to the...

Romans 15:18-19 18For I will not dare to speak of any of those things which Christ hath not wrought by me, to make the Gentiles obedient, by word and deed, 19Through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God; so that from Jerusalem, and round about unto Illyricum, I have fully...

Yes! OK with me!

How dumb is a person that asks a dumb question, repeatedly, eh?

Dumb question which was my initial thought