Search results

That’s a good point, those who agree and worship the beast aren’t the ones he makes war with, it’s the saints that the beast is at war with. If AI is the beast then at some point it has to turn against the saints. Maybe a good question for ChatGPT would be how or by what method it sees itself...

But wouldn’t AI deny it had world dominance, especially if it understood that it was the beast? AI would be deceiving people into thinking peace and safety and AI dominance wouldn’t be considered peace or safe by most people.

I agree with most everything you said in post #1,180. The one thing that I would disagree with, although I don’t think it’s a major difference, is when Jesus started His ministry. After Jesus was baptized He went into the wilderness for 40 days. Matthew 4:12 Now when Jesus had heard that John...

Well, that’s interesting but if AI is the beast then the beast is now interpreting scripture and I guess it could be that anyone who believes AI could also be considered worshipping the beast in some form or fashion.

I do agree with the calendar needing to have an extra 30 days added every so often to keep the spring feast days in the spring. I have no issues with Jesus’ ministry being 1,290 days. Here’s a possibility of how the 1290 and 1335 days could be interpreted. We could say the daily sacrifice was...

Mark 2:10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,) Hebrews 7;27 Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered...

Ok, we have two different ways of looking at how John wrote. You are saying when he says “now” he means now at the time in the narrative timeline, not now when he was writing. I’m saying when he says “now” he means at the time he was writing not at the time in the narrative timeline. Let’s...

How would it look if some wrote an article today, to the people in the US, and started off by saying “Now there is in New York City twin towers, which are part of the World Trade Center”?

John 5:2 Now there is at Jerusalem by the sheep market a pool, which is called in the Hebrew tongue Bethesda, having five porches. The pool of Bethesda was destroyed in 70AD, which places its composition prior to 70AD not 90-110AD.

Ok, so are you admitting you have no idea what’s going to happen in the millennium? You seem to be in agreement that a person can deceive another person, but since the Bible doesn’t explicitly say they will be deceiving one another in the millennium, apparently, you’re not going to admit it...

Great, it looks like we are in agreement. There will be deception occurring during the millennium, but there won’t be any deception from Satan. Now all we need to do is figure out how Satan deceives the nations (<1484> ethnos) and maybe we can at least agree on what a millennial economy looks...

Well, was the Old Testament sufficient for all the needs of those who lived prior to Jesus being on earth? Did the church at Corinth really need Paul’s zero epistle? Here’s the thing, claiming our Canon is complete down to every last word and punctuation mark is a difficult position to defend...

Ok, PinSeeker, I’m just looking for your opinion on this not a debate, I personally think the Canon is complete, but what about if some documents or scrolls were discovered? In 1 Corinthians 5:9 Paul says “I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators” that epistle is what some...

I am sticking to the scriptures. Leviticus 19:11 (NIV) Do not steal. Do not lie. Do not deceive one another. We can deceive one another, that is a Biblical fact. You are the one that seems to be straying from the scriptures by thinking that once Satan is bound we won’t be able to deceive one...

I’m not arguing that Satan will deceive, I’m arguing that if a human can’t deceive another human in the millennium then there isn’t free will in the millennium.

How can a person have complete free will and not be able to deceive another person? I can currently tell someone “everything is going to be alright” when I know it’s not, that would be me deceiving or at least attempting to deceive. If there is no deception in the Premil millennium it would be...

You say you don’t make assumptions but when one person says we are currently in the millennium and another person says it’s still future, someone has to be assuming. The Bible doesn’t explicitly say what date the millennium starts, so we all have to make assumptions on how we interpret verses...

If the Premil millennium contains absolutely no deception whatsoever, then it doesn’t contain free will either. If I were in the millennium and I wanted to deceive another person I wouldn’t be able to, because there would be no deception in the millennium, that means I would have limited free...

I would say it shows the Premil millennium only works with no deception whatsoever. I agree it’s probably futile to get them to admit that but perhaps there are some people reading these posts that might cause them to question the things they’ve been told.

Well, @Ronald Nolette is arguing that no assumptions should be made about Jesus in a future millennium. And I was initially responding to that statement. So it follows that no assumptions should be made for the Amil millennium or Preterist millennium either. As for what proof is there that we...