Search results

True Israel is - that is us today. We are the spiritual children of Abraham. We are the real Jews. We are the circumcision. We are the ones that are located in Zion today. You need to read the New Testament and see that that is a repeated New Testament truth. Race means nothing today. You need...

This is all your opinions. That is all you have. It is time to actually show hard Scripture that teaches your opinion and which corroborates it. Good luck with doing that with Premil!

Israel is not the central focus of Scripture, Jesus is. To think otherwise is gross ignorance and underlying idolatry (elevating someone or something over God). Think about this: we are talking about the central theme of the inspired pages. Anyway, the followers of Jesus are the apple of God’s...

BREAKING NEWS: the old covenant is abolished - in full. It has been completely replaced by a better covenant. It will never again raise its head. It is time to move into the NT. The old covenant is gone forever. It is not the Jewish nation that matters. It is all about sinners in all nations...

The first principle of evidence is: “he who alleges, must prove.” You think if you make a statement like "Israel will be the church on earth during the millennial dispensation, while the church of the previous dispensation will be in heaven" then that makes it a fact. It is not. You have proved...

Amen! He butchers every text he presents and forces his theology into the inspired text after text. That is because he is presenting an unbiblical view.

You are twisting Scripture. Jesus said, speaking to His Jewish converts, in John 10:14-16, “I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this...

The King James Version renders Romans 11:25: “blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.” It means that a remnant of Israel is saved and the rest are blinded while the fulness of the Gentiles comes in. When is the fulness of the Gentiles come in...

Not so. At the core of Dispensationalist teaching is the belief that God has got two distinct peoples on planet earth. They believe He has an earthly people and a heavenly people. They think His earthly people are ethnic Israel and His heavenly people are the New Testament Church. This apartheid...

That text is not supporting your thesis. You're forcing your theology into that text as well. Jesus is simply referring to judgment day, where every knee will bow, and every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. Matthew 23:39 is saying nothing different.

It doesn't say that. A future millennium is not mentioned there, neither is it mentioned anywhere between Ezekiel 37 and 48. You are forcing that to fit what you have been taught. You need to let the Bible speak for itself.

I thought the 144,000 are the firstfruits? You are making them the last fruits.

Op Note! 1Co 4:9 for we are made a spectacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men. Jesus became man not an angel. Scripture is careful at distinguishing between the two. Heb 2:6 What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man, that thou visitest him? Heb 2:7 Thou madest him...

The king of Tyrus was not a type of a perfect Adam in the Garden. He is an example of a wicked tyrant who was full of pride who Satan worked through to do his evil. Tyrus was an example of what rebellion against God looks like. He is an example of fallen man not perfect man.

This is supposed to be proof that cherubs are not angels. Basically: because TribulationSigns says so. According to him, we should not take the Bible literal. Spiritual and physical realities are not real. Angels are not real. Satan is not real. Demons are not real. What is next? What about...

Was the king of Tyrus an "anointed cherub" (Ezekiel 28:14&16)? Was he at one time in the "Paradise of God" (Ezekiel 28:13)? Did he protect "the holy mountain of God" (Ezekiel 28:14)? Was he created "perfect" in his ways "from the day" he was "created" till "iniquity was found in" him (Ezekiel...

I never said you were a heretic. You have a lovely Christian way of communicating.

Satan perverted the truth of God after he fell from heaven at the beginning of creation, as these texts show. He had already fallen before creation.

You avoid questions like this because you promote error. This is how heretics act.

This is talking about a time after the fall of Satan and his demons. None of these answer my question. As I suspected, you have nothing. You make it up as you go.