Search results

My understanding is the understanding of the Reformers. Their understanding was not flawed. Why are you repeating this falsehood? Neither the Reformers nor I have ever claimed such. Why are you repeating this falsehood? Neither the Reformers nor I have ever claimed such. Do you agree with...

So enlighten us from your repository of truth.

I appreciate the encouragement.

You're preaching to the converted. You should redirect these to EES.

So you're the sole oracle of truth. Where can we come to worship?

Whom to believe? 1. You 2. The Reformers whom God called to confront and conquer the antichrist of the historical apostate papacy Do you need a hint?

The Reformers got it right. They recognized the beast (Revelation 13:1-7), coming out from its belly, as they did. There is no Reformation doctrine claiming that the pope is the fourth beast in Daniel 7. The Reformers proclaimed the apostate papacy (unHoly Roman Empire) to be the little horn...

Religiopolitics and militarism. Here're two: Alemanni The chief family in Alamannia was that of the counts of Raetia Curiensis, who were sometimes called margraves, and one of whom, Burchard II, established the Duchy of Swabia, which was recognized by Henry the Fowler in 919 and became a stem...

Explain why the following should not be demonized: “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the...

Edward Gibbon's monumental Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire identifies the following ten kingdoms: Alemanni, Franks, Suevi, Vandals, Burgundians, Ostrogoths, Anglo-Saxons, Visigoths, Lombards, Heruli

Do you mean Daniel 7?

Chris, it was known as the Holy Roman Empire (even though the epitome of unholy), a quintessential combination of religion and politics, pre-dating Islam by more than a century.

I've found the following to be a reasonable explanation: In the Daniel 9:27 Hebrew is seen: 3671 [e] kə·nap̄ כְּנַ֤ף the wing N‑fsc 3671 points to "kanaph". The definition of "kanaph" includes: Strong's Exhaustive Concordance bird, border, corner, end, feathered, flying, one another...

Amens, bro.

When are you going to wean yourself off hallucinogens? Link to any post in which I've said "the Jews themselves are the holy place." Beyond absurd. :laughing:

You err. Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the...

What are "it" and "They"? You don't have a schedule.

The revolting Jews were not an abomination to the Jews. The Romans were. The Romans alone qualified as the abomination of desolation.

Jesus did the explaining. Nothing to worry about.

Matthew does not mention an abomination in the temple. The abomination was in the holy place, which was Jerusalem, the holy city. Matthew and Luke are corroborative.