Search results

Examine the evidence, beginning with that of simple grammatical antecedents/referents. They point to Christ throughout.

Not when the time constraints align themselves. Jesus is found throughout all of verses 24 through 27 inclusive. Your view does not comport with Scripture, grammar, history, or logic.

I am well aware thereof. Do you think Daniel was referring to a "messiah the prince" other than Christ?

Mine is. Messiah the Prince, the prince that shall come, was and is Jesus. Scripturally, grammatically, historically, and logically.

Verse 25 5057 [e] nā·ḡîḏ, נָגִ֔יד the Prince N‑ms Verse 26 5057 [e] nā·ḡîḏ נָגִ֤יד of the prince N‑ms The reason for the difference is self-evident.

Explain the context of the nonexistent OT word "antichrist". Stop perpetuating your dispensational delusions.

Twice is sufficient for me. There is no other nagid like Him. Nowhere in all of Scripture is antichrist (a word for which does not exist in ancient Hebrew or Aramaic) referred to as a prince, nagid or otherwise. That detonates your malinterpretation of the 70 weeks.

So you don't believe that the Messiah is Jesus. Another flunker. "Prince" is "nagid" in both Daniel 9:25 and 9:26.

Since you can't understand it, then leave it for those who can.

Messiah the Prince came 2,000 years ago. True. They were God's people serving as His agents of judgment and destruction. Messiah the Prince was not and is not a Roman. Jeremiah 43 10 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will send and take...

Has God ever used people other than the Jews to accomplish His purposes?

Happened at Christ's first coming. Colossians 1:13

"Your" flunked English. The grammatical antecedent/referent of "prince" in verse 26 is "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25.

There is only one Individual identified as a prince in the passage. He is Messiah. Messiah was and is not a Roman.

John identified it as hearsay: "...ye have heard that antichrist shall come..." He then corrected their misapprehension by informing them that many antichrists were already present. The only future antichrist is the fabrication of the apostate papacy's counter-reformation Jesuit Francisco...

“All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...

Are you a denying dispen?

Colossians 1 12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light: 13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son: The Father knows that His Dear Son established His Kingdom.

That precisely describes the apostate papacy, as the Reformers recognized.

Of what are you unsure?