Search results

I skim read it, but not sure what it has to do with the topic here.

That is obviously what you believe, but only some of it is actually true.

The words are spirit. The foundations of the Lord are spirit. Who does not understand that? Only those ruled by flesh and blood and the ways of this world would not understand that. This whole argument is flesh and blood against the Spirit.

Right on! What is made manifest in this world, is made in parable to those things in heaven. As parables go, the object is most commonly not the subject, but a mere example.

I don't trust NASA.

Science and logic (the worldly understanding of men) are the problem. Better if you had fully considered God and Him in spirit.

Ain't going to happen. Welcome to the rabbit hole.

Another fail. Oh, but a hamster wheel can be proven. Spin it fast enough and even water stays in a bucket.

But a hamster can totally walk in a hamster wheel without falling off?

Yes, that has been the lesson and discovery of history. The flat earther's claim however is that a circle can be flat. BUT--they have not rightly considered all of scripture. As a recent psyop none of what is in the bible really matters to the authors, they (the deep state) just want us...

That is true. But the problem that has been showing itself here is that of interpretation based on ones own understanding.

The waters of this earth we know to be liquid, and that is what God flooded the earth with during Noah's time. But many passages of scripture define what God pours out upon all flesh--which rains down from His heaven, not as liquid, but as His spirit--if not simply what is "above" and what is...

Yes, and a fight of or for what one merely believes according to their own understanding of the scriptures, is against God. On that basis, many here should not be making the claims they do. God is not mocked.

That is so messed up. God has answered me and I have indeed answered to Him--He knows--and knows what you do not. And I have also answered you--just not what you wanted to hear, nor would you heard it. But what I told you was not mine, nor my translation (as your's is), but was directly from God.

I do like what you are saying here... it's like "It takes two." Very true, and yes that is a huge problem...very much on topic. However, whatever side one takes--or worse if takes no side and denies all--it is important that we all leave room in our position taking for God to continue to do...

You are missing the point. God not being bound by time is not what is going on. What is going on is His purpose, not the result or side effect of His creating time. Ask yourself, as He created the world for His own purpose--what purpose would evolution be? Regardless, no, time does not exist...

No, those are your words and challenges which you are only using to support what you believe--yeah, your big "see here" verse. Your pet peeve. You are repeating yourself, clanging cymbals, which proves nothing I haven't already addressed and explained correctly.

I have stated the terms correctly. In the world time is indeed an undeniable force, but we are not to be of the world.

Chihuahua, What is missing in every understanding of evolution, is the understanding of Time. Without time, there is no evolution. With God, there is no time, except as a part of this created world, the substance of which He has defined from the beginning as "image" made manifest in form by...

Your question would make for a good pole. As for me, no, I do not believe in biological evolution. Some limited adaptation, yes, but not evolution. Adaptation proves adaptation--not evolution.