Search results

You believe what papa tells you to believe. When Peter wrote his epistles in Greek, did he speak to himself in Greek or Aramaic? Better put that paperweight down before you injure yourself.

In 1 Peter 1:1 and 2 Peter 1:1, Peter identifies himself not as Cephas but as "Peter"!! Imagine that!! You obviously believe he was wrong!! Whom to believe? 1. You 2. Peter Do you need a hint?

"That's why Paul refers to him NOT as "Peter/Petros" in his letters - but "Cephas"." That was your claim. I proved it wrong. In every reference to the name "Peter" in Scripture, he is petros. Prove that wrong.

These are the typical claims of a cult. What's the name of yours?

Some of us believe: Psalm 103 12 As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us. Hebrews 9 26 For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice...

Thanks for today's guffaws. Let's see that earliest Aramaic manuscript. :laughing: You know, the one that pre-dates the earliest Greek manuscript. In every reference to the name "Peter" in Scripture, he is petros. Paul refers to him as Peter/Petros in Galatians 2:7-8. Got any more free...

Jesus said that Peter was petros, not petra.

Why then are you perpetuating his fallacies? My testimony is Christ crucified on Calvary, completely and perfectly fulfilling Daniel 9:24, affirmed by the entirety of historical orthodox defenders of the true faith. Yours isn't. Explain how the countless defenders of the true faith through...

You weren't. You were taught by the purveyors of Darby/Scofield modernist futurism, originating in the counterfeit fabrications of the counter-Reformation's apostate Jesuit Francisco Ribera. You would do well to investigate those origins. FYI there is not one recognized historical defender of...

You are clearly plainly resolutely unwaveringly determined to continue making a fool of yourself. Don't let me stop you. Do tell us how to "day" Peter in Greek. You alone know. And don't forget 1 Corinthians 10:4. Christ The Petra.

1 Corinthians 10:4 isn't about Peter. It's about Christ. The Petra.

Whom to believe? 1. You 2. Paul Do you need a hint?

1 Corinthians 10:4 Greek Christ is Petra. Christ is a Man.

Keep looking for that Codex. Gotta be in there somewhere.

Have you found that Codex yet? And I'm waiting for a link to the Aramaic manuscript which pre-dates the oldest Greek manuscript. Take your time.

Luke 1:28 Greek 5487 [e] kecharitōmenē κεχαριτωμένη ! [you] favored with grace V-RPM/P-VFS The descriptors permanently, completely, perfectly and enduringly are nonexistent in the definition of the Greek. Just more papist delusion, deception, fabrication and fallacy.

You've not disproved a single point that I've made. Oh, and you'd better get yourself over to the Vatican library and find that Codex Vaticanus and trash it. It's making a fool out of you.

Excellent and amen, bro.

Debunked previously. The NT authors did not write in Aramaic. They wrote in Greek. Every known Greek manuscript (and there are many) distinguishes between Petra and Petros. There is no Aramaic manuscript which pre-dates the oldest Greek manuscript. The Codex Vaticanus in your Vatican...

It is to guffaw. Isaiah 9 6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. So when Isaiah called Christ Wonderful, He wasn't...