Search results

Next paragraph again. Slow down...I say something, then I explain. Very simple.

Who's on first? Revisit the things you think are ridiculous. And yes, it is apparent that you don't know what I am talking about.

Okay, one at a time then. The next paragraph in my post listed what you are not being honest about--about what is written, that you have not factored into your own understanding, or even acknowledged.

You are reacting emotionally and not being honest. It is good that you ask questions. You said "about not being any false teachings", by including those false teachings in your own stated beliefs, namely regarding the timing. Those foundational markers keep you from fully understanding--for...

No, that is not all inclusive (too small) as the world is all inclusive. The only way that the witness is to all the world, is if it occurs throughout all of the history of the world..."since the beginning." Meaning, Israel and the Church...making "one new man."

This is one of those "which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift?" issues. Another way to consider the matter, would be the difference between a word of God from a king, or from a donkey. Which is greater? Meaning: Yes, there are king translations of the Scriptures/Bible...

Of course. But the cloud of two witnesses refers to the first Adam and the Last, in whom all are made one new man.

You will.

No, or you would have offered a similar reasoning to what I have told you by the same Spirit.

Have you never read: So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. 9 Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face...

Wow, you speak of the New Testament, but do not even acknowledge the warnings and the certainty of false teaching dominating the church on a grand scale--and the foretold finish!

And now you have attempted to tell Paul what he said and wrote. You apparently have no idea of even what Paul's calling was--but I tell you, what he spoke, he spoke going in as humble--which you have not perceived--and I speak going out, which he also spoke of, but with glory of what you now...

How will you know what the scriptures actually teach, when you believe what was falsely taught for 2,000 years, as foretold--which you now cling to? Oh, and "mystery" is what God called the scriptures. That's two out of Three, next you will be trying to correct Christ--oh, that's right, you...

I wonder what you would have done with “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you." It is obvious you are not ready to press on, not ready for what is upon us. Too bad.

Keep it up. Keep on accusing.

You already have. I tried to warn you!

Squirm, squirm, accuse, accuse.

I have been speaking by the Holy Spirit above your level--because we are to leave behind the elementary principles of Christ and press on to the perfection promised as "all truth." But you will not hear it, or even try. Post after post after post. Continually and typically accusing, like a child.

At some point I am not going to continue with what you will not hear. You are attempting--as men do--to put everything in worldly terms on a timeline. But where is the timeline in "I am?" There is none--and it is by that same Spirit that I have been speaking.

Again, how would you know (if I am not telling you any truth)? But, on the contrary, I have been clear and even given details. But you, typical of the many, have rejected the truth when told to you.