Search results

You are assuming that the stones Christ spoke about in Matthew 24:1–2 must refer exclusively to the physical stones of the temple building and that His prophecy must therefore be confined to the events of AD 70. But have you considered how Scripture itself uses stones to represent God’s people...

The establishment of God’s kingdom in power was SPIRITUAL, taking place at Pentecost when the Holy Spirit was poured out upon Christ’s people. Did you carefully read and consider the verses I quoted? You cannot simply ignore the scriptural context and force these events into a first-century...

When we are resurrected with Christ, that is the restoration of Israel. Christ's death and resurrection serves as the restoration of Israel "because" Christ is the True Israel. When Christ gave us eyes to see, we were restored (Mark 8:25) Spiritually, not physically. The Kingdom didn't come with...

Good question, indeed. Looks like I need to explain the First Resurrection again for anyone who want to enlightened with. A solid basis for Christians to understand the first resurrection was provided by the Scriptures interpreting themselves, and they clearly declare that the first...

LOL. Typical premillennial fantasy. You are speculating that the white horse of Revelation 6 is Satan or antichrist who will take over the world without fighting a war? "Selah", your interpretation of Revelation 6:2 is not what the text explicitly says. You are imposing a premillennial...

Where, exactly, does Scripture say that the son of perdition will be a “false messiah”? Show us the passage. Quote the actual words of Scripture and explain them in their proper context. Do not present your speculation as biblical fact. It is not enough to make a claim and expect others to...

True. The son of man is the False Messiah? I do not read that in Scripture. Of course. That theorists comes from the premillennial/pre-tribulation rapture camp. Not the Holy Spirit? Not those in the church with the Holy Spirit? But created celestial being with feathered wings called...

Controversial? Ha... no, it "IS" a false doctrine! You are becoming like honey that attracts flies here—the false teachers and laymen who promote Preterism and their first-century fulfillment theories coming down on you. By opening the door to these doctrines, you risk giving false teachers a...

So are the two Olive Trees! Selah! Will this definition of the two witnesses hold true in the other images God uses for them, such as the two witnesses or the two Olive Trees? Do those also symbolize the Church which is the earthly representation of Christ? Again, we go back to the number one...

Ahhh...and there it is—you finally admitted the problem: you have to make Jesus’ “three days and three nights” figurative because your 36-hour calculation doesn't fit the text. :Laughingoutloud: But then you compound it by inventing a story that Scripture never says: that Jesus was resurrecting...

Case in point! “So shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” — Matthew 12:40 Does that sound like 36 hours to you, @Earburner? :laughing: The problem is NOT that Scripture contradicts itself. The problem is trying to force Scripture into your 36-hour...

Yes, I did the math—and you did everything except answer the point. Nobody disputes that Mary found Jesus alive on Sunday morning. The question is whether Scripture says He rose on the third day. It does: “after three days rise again” — Mark 8:31 “he rose again the third day” — 1 Corinthians...

When did Christ resurrected his body, according to Scripture? And yes, it says three days as I explained in my recent response to Earburner just now. After his resurrection, yes, which is on third day. No need to know the exact year, month day hour minute second, or even light year...

(Chuckle). Clearly you did not check with your Bible carefully. You denied that Christ need to wait 3 days for his resurrection. Guess what, Jesus said you are wrong. Here is what He, Himself, said through Mark and Paul: “the Son of man must be killed, and after three days rise again.” —...

LOL. And you still could not explain Matthew 27:52-53 biblically either.

I agreed and I never taught it! So why did you make false accusation like that? Geez! Wrong on both counts. Read the verse carefully: Matthew 27:52–53 "And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went...

I think you got really confused with the conversation between me and Earburner. I was taking his sentence in his post: "Or did he literally see resurrected dead bodies WALKING in the street (for 40 days)?" I was being sarcastic with him for suggesting that I teach about "resurrected dead...

LOL!!!! Wow, you did not read my post well. Didn't you read my quesiton: "And where does Matthew say these resurrected saints walked around Jerusalem for forty days?" It is because you wrote in your flawed post, "Or did he literally see resurrected dead bodies WALKING in the street (for 40...

You do not make a sense at all. You twisted the Scripture. Period.

Chuckle. You keep demanding an answer I already explained long ago, while conveniently avoiding my questions about the dead bodies of the Two Witnesses lying exposed in the street for 3½ days, with no one permitted to bury them (Revelation 11:8–9). The two candlesticks represent the faithful...