Search results

You are not listening--so don't be surprised if I stop responding to you. New and continued revelation is written of by Daniel, promised by Jesus, spoken of by Paul, and specifically identified by John in the book of Revelation. So are false revelations foretold. Do your homework before...

No, false churches are made up of flesh and blood, but the Church built by Christ is not, but is made up of those born of the spirit of God. Many of whom in flesh and blood physically attend churches of flesh and blood men, even against the spirit of God in them, even unknowingly. For this is...

The early church began telling the "lie" warned of by Peter and written of also by Paul, resulting in their choosing to follow Peter (flesh and blood) rather than what Jesus told them He would build His church by as being what came specifically from our Father in heaven...which they began to do...

Who says "the heretical doctrines in the early church were eradicated by the church"--those who were taught by those teaching false doctrines? On the contrary, it is written that "strong delusion" and "great apostacy" and "a falling away" would ensue--not a quick eradication. Which would not...

Read Revelation chapter 10. The "mystery of God" refers to all that was ever unknown about God, which He has been revealing "here a little there a little" since the beginning.

In local and cursory view, yes. But...that is not "all truth." All truth would be the reason it was included in the greater word of God for all eternity. Which is to say, "the words are spirit" as Jesus made clear regarding the words that He spoke to the apostles. That greater "all truth"...

This is obviously just one more LIBERAL WAY OF TWISTING THE FACTS. In reality the Japanese planned their attack on America decades in advance. There airstrips, bunkers, and military installations that were developed across the south Pacific prove it. Here is a picture of one of their 1000-man...

You got it!

Hahah... hlf It is a good attempt! Yet it still holds too much reference to Time--meaning, it is not the full measure of God's own timeless/eternal truth. So, if that way seems to narrow--yes, it is perhaps esoteric. But that just means we have not yet imagined all that is actually, factually...

I have not done what you accuse me of--but have answered you already. But no, for the most part you have been accusational, and not willing to consider that the warnings of false doctrines given in scripture may have affected your own person beliefs, as it is written of many.

I have already been too kind to you--but your first statement there above is not correct. You repeat the woe of the lawyers of Jesus' time, of taking "away the key of knowledge." Your stated position does not allow for hearing "what the Spirit says", or what "must be spiritually discerned." Why...

Yes, and I have also explained what it is not--which is not my interpretation, but His who speaks in me.

That is a reasonable conclusion to think among men/people, but not correct with God. For He first sent the prophets without peer consensus--and what of John, did John discuss Revelation with the other apostles? No. To the contrary, the early church met and included in their consensus "false...

To all it is indeed personal, but to some it is given to teach, to preach, and some to prophesy.

I have stated my case. But understand that it is the subject of many books. For and look at "time no longer", read Revelation 10:1-7...(some translation refer to it as "delay" no longer). For a look at Jesus' promise to have the Holy Spirit lead us into "all truth" read, John 16:1-15. But no...

In the creation of heavens and the earth, God makes manifest everything everyone ever believed, that was "before the foundation of the world"...as evidence for or against all before the Judgement. He is dividing--as it is written--"the light from the darkness." Then comes the end. The stumbling...

:Broadly:

Don't misunderstand, personally hearing from God is biblical. As for "personal revelation", surely those who have defined the term do not even know that revelation is indeed personal. For example, in the case of Peter--the twelve did not hear, but he alone (personally) heard from the Father...

Good questions! As for me having "all the truth", I have only what is given to me. Which I know to be limited, yet very much pertaining to these times and the finish of "the mystery of God as He declared to His servants the prophets." What was before restrained and sealed according to Daniel...

No, the title is not "accusing"--it is stating a fact, and a need stated in the warnings of scripture. The mystics ought to and likely do disagree with me--for they are against God. I am not. But seriously--you are have a major problem with what is the actual method established by God for...