Search results

Of course there are lots of passages to refer to, for the misunderstandings and misinterpretations have been going on for millennia. I might have to number your objections. Jesus ascending "physically" is an assumption. What is written is rather, "in like manner" not actually stating just what...

You're not stupid...but you are back on your haunches like the Priests of Jesus' time about to repeat their folly. During these times--which are biblical, there is more than handwriting on the wall, and I have been quoting it. If you don't want to go so far as to believe that God would repeat...

That distinction simply shows one truth regarding two different groups--each "of" different need, under the One True Gospel. Which is salvation in Christ to the dead and to the living, as Paul also said, "but each one in his own order." Again, that difference is not different in Christ, but...

I get that, but the question remains the same: Would your own letter to a Jew, and another to a gentile be the same or different? Would your own words not be "of" one distinct explanation as opposed to the other, even "of" the same gospel?

I suppose then that you would be equally "polite"...to perhaps...Noah, if he told you what God had tasked him to do. How nice of you.

It is the audience that is different, not the gospel. If you yourself wrote a letter to a Jew regarding salvation, and another to a gentile--would the letters be the same or different?

Because, if you can receive it, the scriptures give witness to it, which I have sighted in many places.

In this case Holy fire...which is God in spirit.

:running:Oh--no--I'm not getting into this!

My first Bible was the King James Version. The first Bible I read was probably a New International Version, which belonged to my brother and his wife--which I read cover to cover in about a week. But the first one I bought for myself (the KJV), I just picked because it was the cheapest and I...

Mary, you are assuming your definition of "the Church" is the same as Jesus' definition. But it's not: Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18 And I also say to you that you are...

Yes, and it is God who imposed that confusion upon all language, until just before the end. Then, and only then were things to be made clear. Which things I now declare. I did not claim that "Jesus' coming was not back in history, nor in the future." I simply explained what He and Paul said of...

For some, it's not enough to quote the scriptures, not enough to declare revelation from God, or to receive correction. So be it--so let it be written.

The quoted verses begin in my first post and continue throughout the rest of the thread. If you are going to complain and make accusations, you really should read the thread first. Comprehension is from God.

Now look who's "thinking highly of themselves."

As it has been declared from the beginning: all is "created" and the non-substance of "image" (by the light and power of God, the illusion of all matter).

Jesus gave the answer as 10 virgins, with 5 who are foolish. Those that stem from the destructive doctrines of false teachers foretold by Peter, and the lie foretold by Paul. I have already quoted the chapters and verses. 5 (half) are foolish. As for the Jehovah Witnesses, as it is written...

WELCOME--all the best to you! Scott

WELCOME! Because this is your first forum experience I might caution you: Forums are not unlike the world, and in many cases perhaps worse. In the world we don't often confront issues among those we come in contact with. But on a forum? Oh do we ever! But do not be disheartened, this is all...

Okay, and you said "you" which you may have meant of me personally, or as a general statement of anyone. But it doesn't matter. Regardless, again the issue and topic is not really judging others. In other words, biblically speaking there were Judges who rightly judged, and certainly there are...