Search results

And that's where you continue to be as wrong and dishonest as ever. I NEVER named the "version" that I use. I simply told you that I reject the peverted New World Translation put out by the Watchtower Society - and I gave you the reasons why, beginning with the unqualified team of...

I already answered your question about the name, "Jehovah". You have YET to address I pointed out the contextual conuncrun you are in with John 1:1 and verses like Isa. 45:5, Exod. 20:3 and Exod. 23:13 which say that ALL other gods are false gods. As to why I trust the Church and NOT a man...

The Triune Godhead is testified to iin Scipture. The Father is God Eph. 4:6, Psalm 68:5, Mal. 2:10, 2 Cor. 1:3-4, John 3:16, John 8:41, 1 Thess. 3:13 The Son is God Isaiah 7:14, Isaiah 9:6, Matt. 4:7, John 1:1, John 1:3, John 8:58, John 10:30, John 14:9, John 20:28, 2 Corinthians 4:4, Phil...

Sorry – but your entire point is moot because you failed to address the CONTEXTUAL problem you have with John 1:1 and verses like Isaiah 45:5, Exod. 20:2-3, 23:13, which tell us that there is only ONE God and there are to be NO OTHER gods besides Him. So, contextually, we would have to accept...

And there you have it. Your objection is NOT basaed on language - as much as iut is based simply in your refusal to accept the Triune Godhead. I can only present the fats. I can't help you with your lack of faith . . . NOT according to YOUR wooden, inflexible translationn of Theos. According...

Ummmmm, first of all - I never addressed John 3:16 as being "contradictory" to John 1:1. I saud that to render John 1:1 as “a god” instead of “God” icompletely contradicts verses like Isaiah 45:5, Exod. 20:3 and 23:13 - which you have NOT addressed. God is crystal clear that HE is the ONLY God...

The entire JW argument about whether the Word id God or "a god" falls flat on its face, contextually. We are told in Scripture that ALL gods other than THE God are false gods. God Himself tells us that there is NO OTHER gods besides Him (Isaiah 45:5, Exod. 20:3, 23:13). So, to render John 1:1...

The New World Translation (NWT) was tailored for the perverted doctrines invented by Charles Taze Russell, the false prophet and founder of the Watchtower Society. A few glaring examples of JW doctrinal bias resulting in the perversion of Scripture in the New World Translation (NWT) are: - In...

An unqualified team of FIVE men translated the NWT: Fred Franz, Milton Henschel, George Gangas, Albert Schroeder, and Nathan Knorr. Franz was the ONLY one of them who had ANY knowledge at all of Hebrew and Greek – and studied Greek for just TWO years. This did NOT include the Biblical Koine...

The Bible itself doesn't teach this Protestant fallacy - so why would YOU believe it? If you believe it IS taught in Scripture - then show me where. Chapter and Verse, please. Ahhhhh - more of your revisionist lies. At NO time in histiry did the Church sanction the sale of Indulgences. This...

I see we have yet another student of revisoionist history here. Aloow me to educate you . . . The office of the Papacy was established by Jesus Christ, who singgled out Peter (Matt. 16:18) to lead the rest and strengthen them (Luke 22:30-31) and feed His lambs and tend His sheep (John...

A rather skewed version of history, to say the least. But, in order to avoid a 5-page response - I will deal only with the most dishonest parts above in RED . . . First of all - let's deal wiith YOUR usage of the term, "Roman Catholic Church". There is no "Roman" Catholic Church - only "The...

Funny - that's NOT what Jesus said. Jesis said that one becomes a disciple of His (a Christian) by being Baptized: Matt. 28:19-20 Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I...

That's NOT what Jesus said . . . Mark 16:16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. As a matter of fact the Bible teaches MANY times that Baptism is not only NOT merely "symbolic" - but that it means a LOT more than YOUR clueless...

Another one of your idiotic, anti-Biblical claims . . . Ummmmmm - can you show me WHERE Peter refers to Paul as "Hed of the church"??Chapter and Verse, please. Secodnly - You judge Peter's impoirtance by how many pages of Scripture he wrote (or didn't write) - yet you've completely ignored the...

Yes, well, that's a moot point - given the fact that there are NO original autographs in existence. All we have are fragments, copies - and testimonies.

WRONG. Matthew was a Jew anbd an Apostle whose native tongue ewas Aramaic. Greek was the linhgua franca of commerce, intellect and otherwise public communication in the 1st century Eastern Mediterranean Region. Eusebius's comment was about Mathhew's native tongue - NOT the language if the Gentiles.

This is nonsense. It would have to logivally follow, then that EVERYBODY who came after Papias spoke in "hearsay" or "thirdhand" because all of the Apostoles were DEAD. As to your objections about Papias's claim regarding Mathhew's Gospel being originally written in Hebrew - this is NOT a...

Yup - he certainly does NOT engage in honest dialogue. He always winds up regurgitating the same nonsense - even after it's been refuted. Unfortunately - there are MANY like him here . . .

That’s a LIE. I never equated Peter to Jesus. I never even said that he had the Keys to the Kingdom of David. JESUS gave him the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven (Matt. 16:18). STUDY your Bible . . . If you keep vomiting out LIES like this – we’ll never have an intelligent discussion. I pointed...