Search results

An you don't see how asinine your question is - coming from a Sola Scripturist?? You're demanding that I prove something feom Scripture - that Scripture is completely SILENT about. Can YOU show me where Infant Baptism is "forbidden" in Scripture, Sola Scripturist? Let's see how your idiotic...

Absolutely - the nature of God has been revealed aas the TRINITY (Gen. 1:26, Matt. 28:19, John 15:26, 1 Cor. 12:4-6, 2 Cor. 13:14, 1 John 5:7, Eph. 4:6, Psalm 68:5, Mal. 2:10, Isa. 63:16, 2 Cor. 1:3-4, John 3:16, John 8:41, 1 Thess. 3:13, Isa. 7:14, Isa. 9:6, John 1:1, John 1:3, John 8:58, John...

You always stick your foot in your mouth by lying about something I allegedly said. Show me the POST where I "taight" this nonsesne. Post #, please . . . I already challenged you to show me the Chapter and Verse where the Son was a sperm cell. You failed - and now your doing damage-control...

Those of us with faith in God don't go "blank".

Show me the verse that says Father turned the Son into a sperm cell - and I'll show you where God created a man using only the dust of the earth (Gen 2:7). God isn't bound by your limited undeerstanding of biology. He can do whatever He wants - HOWEVER He wants. What a pathetic little god...

Correct. Nope - that's one of YOUR idiotic, heretical statements - which I have corrected several times now. I guess I should be happy that you got the FIRST part correct, though.

My comment in post #521 aboiyt YOUR idiotic statements was about ALL of your idiotic staements - especially regarging John 1:1 NOT being about Jesus. A cheeseburger has enough sense to recognize that it is about Jesus, the Son being spoken about in John 1. To be fair, though - the cheeseburger...

Once again - you've posted am extremely verbose diatribe about "many languages" - yet you ohave FAILED to understand the pont. As I stated earlier - it's NOT about what languages people SPOKE in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the world in the 1st century. The NT was WRITTEN in Koine Greek...

And yet, you can't substatiate your claim that Jesus had "siblings" - with the weight of Scripture against you.

Another idiotic claiim from yet another cluless anti-Catholic. Time for a History Lesson . . . First of all - virtually the ENTIRE Bible is read aloud and discussed during the Liturgy of the Word at mass during any given 3-year cycle. Secondly - it might interest you to know that aas much as...

No - I said YOUR statements are idiotic. So, I proved my point. You make an asinine statement about God and His Word - and when the SAME grmmatoical criterion is applied to YOU - you collapse like a deck of cards. Thanks, Einstein.

Sooo - by YOUR logic, it stands to reason to say - "The idiotic statements made by Truther are not simply idiotic statements - they are actually Truther in the flesh." Would YOU dsy that this is a reasonable statement?

Pay attention, Einstein . . . John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was GOD. It doesn't say, "The Word was spoken by God." It says, "The Word WAS GOD.' Now - what happened to that Word that WAS GOD? John 1:14 And the Word (God) became FLESH, and dwelt...

Soooo, the tends of thousands of perpetually-splintering Protestant sects that ALL teach diffrent doctrines based on the interpretational whims of their human founderss were ALL led to this confusion by the Holy Spirit?

John 1:1, 14 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was GOD. And the Word (God) became FLESH, and dwelt among us (and we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father), full of grace and truth. This ain't rockect science, Einstein - but uit DOES...

So, YOUR spirit doesn't dwell in a body?? That's a really stupid claim, Einstein.

You don't dwell in your body, quasi-Christian? Where DO you dwell??

And there you have it, folks - A pathetic denial of history from a guy who has just been caught with BOTH feet ub his nouth. THANK YOU, Einstein.

Just the kind of idiotic and scared responses I expected . . .

And once again - you have your history all screwed up. You're blaming this on the Council of Nicaea in the FOURTH century - when the Trinity, by name, was being discussed 150 years EARLIER by the liked of Tertullian and others. Got room for another foot in that nouth??