Search results

Because Jesus IS God (John 1:1).– And whoever denies this fact is NOT a Christian. The luxury of having it explicitly taught from the New Testament and the Church – which is a luxury that Peter DIDN’T have. As to your question about “What Church” - there is only ONE Church. As to the verses...

More nonsense. You’re not “taking the bait” because it destroys your argument. I explicitly states that the OT Types that I presented point to Jesus – so I don’t know what you’re ranting about. And Peter no more sits on the throne of David that Joseph sat on the throne of Pharoah. Apparently...

WRONG again. I was taught by Christ’s Church (Matt. 28:19-20) who Jesus is - and by the Scriptures. Peter didn’t have this luxury. HIS revelation came directly from God – not through the Magesterium of His Church. There was nothing in the OT that told Peter that Jesus of Nazareth was the...

Thank you for thar extremely limited understanding of Scripture. There are MULTIPLE types and fulfillments in Scripture that all POINT to Christ – but do not involve Him directly. David and Elizabeth OT - "Who am I that the Ark of my Lord should come to me?" (2 Sam. 6:9) NT - "Who am I that...

Then YOU believe Jesus to be a fool because HE is the one who pointed it out about Peter: Matt. 15:17 And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. PRECISELY why Peter was called “Protos” (Matt...

And as I explained - this is an asinine argument - given the fact thatr Jesus did NOT speak Greek to the Apostles, but ARAMAIC. The Aramais "Kepha" means "Rock" - not "little" rock. - I explaimned tpo you that this is the reason that Paul regers to him as "Cephas" - not "Petros" in his...

Eliakim being given the Keys to the house of David is an OT TYPE of Peter, who was given the Keys to the Kningdom of Heaven. Only a blind person would NOT see the almost vernbbatim blessings and commissions of Authority in these 2 situations.

As I explained to you in my last post - Jesus bestowed a THREEfold blessing on Simon Peter. The FIRST par (v. 17) is indeed about the revelation he received from God about Jesus. The next 2 parts pof the blessing are both Prophetic (v. 18) and Authoritative (v. 19). - At the Last Sipper - Jesus...

This is absolute nonsense. Kepha ONLY means "Rock", there is NO Aramaic word for "little roCk". The ONLY reason Peter is referred to as "Petros" in Greek is because "Petros" is a masculine noun. It would have been ludicrous to call him the feminine "Petra" un the Greek - whoich would have been...

- continued . . . David Hill Presbyterian minister and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Biblical Studies University of Sheffield, England On this rock I will build my church: the word-play goes back to Aramaic tradition. It is on Peter himself, the confessor of his Messiahship, that Jesus...

Who said anything about Peter or Abraham being "greater" than Jesus?? I simly pointed to the fact that hey are BOTH referred to as "Rosk" in the Scriptures as is Jesus. Jesus blessing on on Peter is THREEfold: 1. And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are YOU, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has...

"Melting down"? Because I associated you with your father, Satan? I guess the truth hurts, huh?

Another TEXTBOOK example of the blind followinf the even MORE blind . . .

Uhhhh, more like a proctologist - but being "proud" of getting on people's nerves is a sentiment straight froimn your father, Satan . . .

There's only ONE - but go ahead and keep micking Him. Don't say I didn't warn you. Oh, and - good luck . . . Matt. 7:22-23 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I...

You're not bothering me wuth your idiocy - but I'm sure God isn't too pleased with it. The lies you've vomited out regarding ALL of these points - especially the ones above in RED have been explained to you ad nauseam - yet you continue to lie about the m. So, when you're standing alone in...

WRONG. A "Chrsiatian" by definition is one who believes in and is baprized inti the Triune God of Christianity - Fatherm Son and Holy Spirit. Only ONE of us fits that descripttion. Besides - exposing heresy and lies isn't "bad fruit". Perhaps you should actually STUDY that Bible . . .

Fist of all – I don’t even understand what the “Roman version of the story” means. If you are referring to the Catholic Church – then SAY, “Catholic”. I am a Catholic – NOT a “Roman”. Secondly – I DON’T use exclusively Catholic sources in my debates for this very reason. I use Protestant...

No - but UNLIKE your false doctrines of Sola Scruptura and Sola Fide - the TEACHING about the Triune Gidhead is there (Gen. 1:26, Matt. 28:19, John 15:26, 1 Cor. 12:4-6, 2 Cor. 13:14, 1 John 5:7, Eph. 4:6, Psalm 68:5, Mal. 2:10, Isa. 63:16, 2 Cor. 1:3-4, John 3:16, John 8:41, 1 Thess. 3:13...

I think it's the verse right next to the one that says, "Sola Scriptura". Or the one after the one that says, "Sola Fide". MAYBE it's on the same page as the one that says "Bible" . . .