Search results

Off Amazon.com or Ebay. Look for Lost Books of the Bible and the forgotten books of Eden.

And that proves what?

I left the AOG church for teaching some of the heresies I am against. There is a big difference in knowing ABOUT truth, and POSSESSING truth.

If you have read it you will know it includes a prophecy that was not even close to being fulfilled at that early date when the epistles were gathered together to publish in one place. But when it was found on Mt. Siani, it was much closer, about 1400 years closer. And now, the fulfillment is...

Have you ever read it? I believe it has inherent authority. That is what it means to be canonical.

I don't know what you were taught. Were you Pentecostal or just Charismatic, like a Baptist Charismatic? I am not a denominationalist, and believe all of our New Covenant. That is where we differ.

You are entitled to your opinion, of course. The Epistle of Barnabas adds back what was already there in the first century. The Didache was a record of what some of those teachings were, some of which we no longer have. The E of B is where the Didache got what is now missing. I have never liked...

Just so you know, not all our NT books were universally accepted as canonical when the list of books was finalized . Books such as 2 and 3 John, Hebrews and even Revelation weren't accepted by all. I was surprised. But those lists led me to read some of the books that wound up on 6 lists, but...

Going into a Catholic church doesn't make you a priest, or even an alter boy. It seems you were like I was for the first 6 years of knowing about the Spirit, just that you never got past only knowing about, to actually being filled and experiencing the awesome power. If you did, you wouldn't...

I doubt you were ever a Charismatic. Unfortunately, your reasoning has thrown you way off course in the land of no covenant.

ROFL Another erroneous conclusion. You are like a plane without a navigation system who flies completely off course. You base one false premise onto another false premise and think you are going toward the land of truth, instead of into the depths of the ocean. We have no common ground as a...

Again, you don't understand our New Covenant. Nothing in it ends until the covenant itself ends. That is Scripture. But you go along and join your Cessationist friends, and let the blind lead the blind.

No, because you have no idea of covenant law, you think it can be broken. When you show that ignorance, nothing you say is credible like: - tongues was for writing scripture. - tongues ceased in the middle of the covenant when the scriptures were published. - tongues could be understood by the...

Except that your opinion is not based on scripture, but a far-fetched interpretation, and Charismatic's are based on actual scripture.

Wrong.

Wrong.

What do you believe is the purpose of speaking in tongues?

For the mind, yes, but the SPIRIT is edified.

But you are misinterpreting "understanding is unfruitful" to meaning it IS fruitful. No, it's not WITHOUT the gift of interpretation of tongues.

I've seen and read in scripture that someone being drawn to Jesus and not yet saved was sovereignly given the interpretation of tongues (like in Acts 2), but can't explain by scripture someone supernaturally understanding a human tongue. That could be word of knowledge.