Search results

Careful...even Jesus had to clarify what the scriptures actually said (and even explain His own words to his own apostles), against the inclinations of would-be religious scholars (Priests and Pharisees). The point is, the revelation "all truth" belongs to God alone, while it is foretold that...

"Every eye shall see" by definition, is as broad as all of creation, meaning all of history undone, with "every"one ever born present--not at all possible within the times of this world, but only at its undoing. "Coming in the clouds of heaven" is that very same moment. But it would be wrong to...

If it did not take getting out of one's self to understand the reality of what was said in Acts 1:10-11, I could very well have said it much simpler. The point is...the context is as great as angels talking from heaven across the void to men, saying what could be looked at from the worldly...

The difference is that what is of this world and what is seen is only made manifest for the revelation of Him who makes manifest who is unseen. In other words, we who are created in the image of God see according to images rather than what actually is--because we have only considered all things...

Yes, and that is the point of confusion...because most would take that to mean in the way they saw, not considering it was merely a manifestation of what is otherwise unseen and spiritual. But which is greater, the manifestation or He whom made manifest...and what "like manner" did He make...

I could say that coming "with" the clouds is one truth, while all people "on earth" will mourn is another truth. But one would have to understand that Jesus bringing heaven "with" him makes for the end of this earth...meaning two sides of the one event. Do you see and understand this--that...

Heaven has been described as "above", and that does indeed work for the first and second heaven which are physically above the earth. However, the kingdom of heaven is not [actually] physically "above", but as it is written (Jesus speaking) is "within." This is the distinction and the purpose...

The possible metaphor of "clouds" is however not the point of distinction. It is rather the fact that it specifically says in "heaven", meaning not a worldly event, but a heavenly event. Also, by the laws of the heaven as opposed to earth, the context for "every eye will see", can only mean in...

Most people are under the wrong impression. The point is, there is a big difference between seeing Jesus coming in the clouds in the skies of this world, and "the clouds of heaven." Coming in the clouds in the skies of this world is not biblical, as it specifically says "the clouds of heaven"...

More lies and psychological projection :(

This is perhaps one of the most misunderstood passages in the Bible. It includes many points that can be interpreted in multiple ways. Even so, it is not possible that this passage contradicts or makes void the many other passages that establish the true spiritual nature of God and Jesus going...

Ending with more accusations (lies) is quite apropos.

This is what has been taught and what most believe, and what most expect to see of Jesus' second coming, as "coming in the clouds": But this is what is actually written (Jesus speaking): "Now when He was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, He answered them and said...

I would not have replied except for your accusation of "having no answers." On the contrary, I have given more to you than to most. And for this, you yourself have all the more to answer for. Luke 12:48 Yes, time is short.

These things are all true--just not the way you think and believe. You are referring to what was merely enacted in the flesh as being what is to be, just as some consider the Temple of God to be stone. It's not. Nor is any of what you have quoted referring to the flesh...or for that matter--all...

You (and the many) are not "rightly dividing the word of truth." You are not dividing the "dust" of creation and birth of men of flesh from that which is born of the spirit and is thus of God. Contrary to popular belief, the "image" created in mankind is made up of the same elements ("dust") of...

I am not here to debate these things with you. This is not a debate. One either hears what the Spirit says to the churches, or not. Meanwhile, you beating your own drum serves no purpose which I care to participate in as long as you continue by your own understanding--and certainly not by the...

Now we're getting somewhere. But debating the details in standoff is of no profit. You mention the church being apostate according to the Jehovah's Witnesses--well, it is and it isn't--not excluding themselves. Both were foretold. Both being lead unto all truth, and also many being deceived...

Your take on all this is a popular one among men, mine is not. As for you accusation and misgiving of "allegory"-- what did you think man being made in the image of God is?

It's only a chess move by Russia and China. Not to worry.