Search results

Because its all about the first advent. No single verse or chapter in the bible mention Jesus living and ruling on the earth for 1000 years it doesn't exist. If it were true and the bible is literal wouldn't it all be together mentioned at least once?

Yes no NT writer or even Jesus ever mentioned Him ruling on the earth for 1000 years

The church age started on the day of Pentecost and is still going today

Because its all about the time of the first advent of Jesus and Jesus explained what the living water is. John 7:37-39 37 On the last and greatest day of the festival, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is thirsty come to me and drink. 38 Whoever believes in me, as Scripture...

That was the mountain that shook the world

No I don't we are in the symbolic 1000 year church age now

In the first advent on the day that Jesus ascended Jesus stood on the mount of olives and gave the command to spread the gospel to the world and what happened shook the world. The gospel started to spread from Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost through the power of the Holy Spirit through the...

Also Zechariah makes more sense when you realize that Zechariah talks about both the earthly Jerusalem and the new Jerusalem one is destroyed and one is protected

Very true so many places in the last few chapters of Zechariah in that day applies to the days Jesus was on the earth

No it won’t be anything like that God won’t condemn anyone to hell for using a digital currency even if it was a chip in the body. That would violate the promises in scripture that salvation is for all who repent and verses like John 3:16 What did Jesus say that the only unforgivable sin was...

No one can come back from the lake of fire but if there is no spiritual resurrection how would you explain the verse below? Colossians 3:1 Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God

Once again you are claiming something I have never said or believe. This is not a good way to debate taking cheap shots and adding things to the debate that are not said. We need to debate in love and grace and debate about the things which were said after all we are on the same side aren't we?

Again you are claiming things that I never said please stick to what and debate what I said and not what I didn't say

Did you post see #802? Futurism does add to the text

Why are you bringing up ridiculous things which I never said or think? There is a difference between a physical resurrection and a spiritual resurrection. We have died and have been raised spiritually just like Paul said. Did you see post #802?

Well that’s not the New Testament but Jesus did stand on the mount of olives after Zechariah penned that verse and what Jesus did paved the way for the gospel to spread to the world

The point of the beheaded being raised back to life in revelation 20:4 isn’t about people literally beheaded by the beast coming back to life it’s a message that you will live even though you die for Christ. Revelation 3:21 21 To the one who is victorious, I will give the right to sit with me...

The text is about Jesus being slow in His coming and people doubt it

No that’s not what I said please don’t claim things that I never said I said that there is a thousand years and I believe it is symbolic for the church age

Name one verse in the New Testament showing that Jesus returns and steps on the earth. Jesus never spoke about it in the gospels don’t you think that He would of if it happens?