Search results

Apparently, you did not read and understand what I wrote multiple times on the topic.

My point is that if all Republicans created it, the media would cover it 24-7, trying to get them all to resign. When it's Demonrats, different story.

Trinitarians say it to themselves so often, they no longer grasp how it violates the Law of Identity. How they rationalize this is to falsely equate the Supreme Being as one among types of life forms. Such as a generic horse begetting another horse. However, at the next level of detail...

But Jesus is not the word in John 1:1 AND 1:14 does not say God became flesh.

This proves Jesus is NOT God. The only reason something is in the form of something is that it is NOT that thing. For instance, my savings bank is in the form of a pig. My savings bank is NOT a pig.

Proving Jesus is NOT God but a created, begotten Being.

Trinitarian anti-logic.

What a human tragedy. I'm sure the media will play this up 24-7, demanding to know what Biden is going to do about it, along with the Democrat Governor and the Democrat mayor.

Fred or George? You are not a serious student of the Bible! I'll save myself grief by putting you on ignore. The fact that it has no name proves it is not a person. You just refuse to see it.

Works equally well ‘this’. Houtos.

Not the question I asked. What is this ’person’s name? Don’t you find it odd that the Bible makes a big deal about people name, changes their name, YHWH is God’s eternal name Ex 3:15, yet this person, who is supposedly fully God has no name?

Non persons are referred to as this. Houtos means ‘this’ in John 1:2 as it is correctly translated in John 6:60. ‘That’ is not properly translated ‘he’. Give me this book you are reading.

This is the way. NATO has outlived its usefulness and become the very thing it was created to oppose - aggression from a hostile actor.

What is this ‘person’s’ name?

Just read a big policy issue for RFK Jr; vaccines and autism. The rate of autism is something like 100x higher than a generation ago. Something is causing that.

This is the dead giveaway that Trinitarians know they cannot support their doctrine. The simple deflection tactic is only they get to ask questions. For a given proposition, there are likely to be pro’s and con’s. Let’s say, putting fluoride in the drinking water? Just because there are SOME...

Again that is true for all first born children - until more children come around. You too are merely repeating the assertion and not reconciling that we are all begotten and we are all God's children.

Repeating obsolete facts is not logical. How do you reconcile this claim with Scripture saying we are all God’s children?

See below.

You should check out my thread “Evidence To Be Seen.” Something came up that I need to add to that thread. The blood on the Shroud of Turin was tested. Two findings: The blood is still alive. The blood has only 23 chromosomes. Normally, a person has 46 chromosomes, 23 from each parent. If...